Why:
The html tags weren't removed from the text that was rendered at the
social metatags (twitter & facebook), neither scaped so adding a quoted
text would endup breaking the metatag content and writting in plain
sight the description at the browser view.
How:
Saniziting the text and truncating it afterwards since we don't need to
send more than 140 chars for twitter/facebook social cards.
Why:
The Admin Budget form has a submit button for saving the record, adding
another submit input to destroy the record actually adds to the html:
`<input type="hidden" name="_method" value="delete">` and it collides
with the save button, forcing it to perform a destroy instead of save.
Previously the destroy button was not in the same div as the save button
How:
Just changing the Destroy from a button_to to a link_to.
During a Participatory Budget, some users are getting confused and
creating a proposal instead of a budget investment. This intermediate
page should help them create investments
Adding a feature flag just in case other forks don’t need this feature
and setting seeds and dev_seeds for appropriate initial setup
This method is already existent in the application_controller but it
seems a little overkill to create a concern just for this method
Maybe when we have multiple method it makes sense to create a nice
controller. Another option would be to make the
management_base_controller extend from the application_controller
This is a preventive change which will be useful once the rake to
migrate from `spending_proposals` to `budget_investments` is complete
As after running that migration, old `spending_proposal` budgets will
have a newer `id` than the existing budgets. And therefore the last
budget will be one of those migrated from the old `spending_proposal`
model
By ordering by `created_at` and probably updating the `created_at`
attribute in the rake that migrates `spending_proposals` to
`budget_investments`, we will have a coherent order for budgets
