We were creating records with a title we manually set, so to be
consistent with the rest of the code, in the test we check the title is
present using a string literal.
This way we can also remove useless assignments while keeping the code
vertically aligned.
This way we write the tests from the user's point of view: users can see
(for example) a proposal with the title "Make everything awesome", but
they don't see a proposal with a certain ID.
There are probably dozens, if not hundreds, of places where we could
write tests this way. However, it's very hard to filter which ones are
safe to edit, since not many of them have an HTML class we can use in
the tests, and adding a class might generate conflicts with CSS styles.
So, for now, I'm only changing the ones allowing us to cleanly remove
useless assignements while maintaining the code vertically aligned.
The group is automatically assigned when we assign the heading. The
budget isn't needed either, except for a special case related to the
reason to be rejected.
These settings are enabled by default.
It could be argued explicitely enabling the features makes tests more
consistent, because they'll work if we change the default setting. It
could also be argued that it makes tests more expressive because it
makes the reader realize certain things will only work if a setting is
enabled.
However, we were only doing so in a few tests. The truth is, thousands
of our tests depend on certain features being enabled. So IMHO we should
be consistent and either set them on every test, or not at all. I'm
choosing the latter option for simplicity.
Settings are stored in the database, and so any changes to the settings
done during the tests are automatically rolled back between one test and
the next one.
There were also a few places where we weren't using an `after` block but
changing the setting at the end of the test.
After adding investment translatable fields to forms, they will be
generated with nested translations names and ids so we can no longer
use standard id locator.
Using input label text to fill in fields works with both types of forms.
The `type: :feature` is automatically detected by RSpec because these
tests are inside the `spec/features` folder. Using `feature` re-adds a
`type: :feature` to these files, which will result in a conflict when we
upgrade to Rails 5.1's system tests.
Because of this change, we also need to change `background` to `before`
or else these tests will fail.
There was a typo: `new_order = eq(all(` instead of `new_order = all(`,
which was causing the tests to pass.
However, the final expectation should test that we keep the same order
in the same session, and we were accidentally testing the opposite.
We're also adding an extra check to verify there are investments on the
page, since in some cases we were accessing pages with no investments,
and so these tests were always passing.
This is the actual number of investments per page in the index action.
Also note one test was generating 100 extra records, which made the test
take more than 40 seconds (on my machine).
We were showing only the ones being shown in the current page because
we were modifying `@investments` using a method which used
`@investments`, and we were calling that method twice.
There are many possible solutions: using a local variable to store the
result of the `investments` method, modifying `@investments` after
modifying `@investments_map_coordinates`, ... I've used the one which in
my humble opinion is a bit less fragile: not using `@investments` inside
the `investments` method. That way, the `investments` method will always
return the same result.
Note `stub_const("Budgets::InvestmentsController::PER_PAGE", 2)`
wouldn't work because `Budgets::InvestmentsController` isn't loaded when
that line is executed. So we need to load it. Instead of requiring the
file, using `#{Budgets::InvestmentsController}` seems to be an easier
solution.
We were filtering by winners investments for finished budget without
having in consideration other filters.
We want the default filter to be `winners` for finished budgets.
