Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Javi Martín
f93c85bd2e Don't check the database during system tests
As mentioned in commits like a586ba806, a7664ad81, 006128da5, b41fbfa52
and c480cdd91, accessing the database after starting the browser with
the `visit` method sometimes results in database corruption and failing
tests on our CI due to the process running the test accessing the
database after the process running the browser has started.

IMHO this is also a bad practice for system tests, since these tests
should be checking what users experience.

So, just like we did a few commits ago with tests that reloaded records,
we're modifying the tests to check the results of user interactions from
the point of view of the users.

Also note we aren't changing tests with the `:no_js` tag, since these
tests don't run a real browser in a separate process. In the future, we
should also change most of these tests so they don't access the database
and they use a real browser.

Finally, note that one of the tests we're changing in the shared
`notifiable_in_app` file did not check the database content, but we're
also changing it for consistency.
2025-04-01 14:53:27 +02:00
Javi Martín
2575fb316b Simplify test checking multiple officing sessions
We can reuse the `officing_verify_residence` method to make the test
easier to read.

We're also removing the final visit to final_officing_polls_path because
it doesn't really add anything to the test.
2025-04-01 14:53:27 +02:00
Javi Martín
7b6d6266e5 Remove redundant expectations in officing test
We were checking that a field exists before interacting with it.
However, the methods that interact with fields already check whether the
field exists, so there's no need for us to check that.
2025-04-01 14:53:27 +02:00
Javi Martín
1593a150e7 Move in_browser expectations inside the same block
This way the code is easier to follow, and we avoid having simultaneous
requests on different browser sessions, which in theory shouldn't affect
the application, but the test might be a bit more robust this way.
2025-03-26 16:27:08 +01:00
Javi Martín
0cec581ec0 Add and apply Capybara/RSpec/HaveSelector rule
This rule was added in rubocop-capybara 2.19.0. We were following it
about 85% of the time.

Now we won't have to check both have_css and have_selector when
searching the code.
2023-11-08 14:18:16 +01:00
Javi Martín
a1439d0790 Apply Layout/LineLength rubocop rule
Note we're excluding a few files:

* Configuration files that weren't generated by us
* Migration files that weren't generated by us
* The Gemfile, since it includes an important comment that must be on
  the same line as the gem declaration
* The Budget::Stats class, since the heading statistics are a mess and
  having shorter lines would require a lot of refactoring
2023-08-30 14:46:35 +02:00
decabeza
1ff2144830 Show always poll officer menu to officers
Since the change on commit cbbe188d6 we added a Poll.current.any?
condition to show the officing link on admin menu to officers.

That condition doesn't have much sense since Poll results only can be
added after a poll has ended, and there may be only one active poll.
2023-02-17 14:07:02 +01:00
Javi Martín
2e9c4de061 Unify specs testing access to admin menu items
In most sections, we had two specs testing what happens after accessing
one of the privileged areas. We're grouping the expectations and so
we've only got one test per area, making these tests faster.
2023-02-17 14:07:02 +01:00
Javi Martín
465d2d604d Move login items tests to the component
This way we reduce the number of system tests or, in some cases,
requests during system tests, making the tests faster.

We're still testing the interaction with the menu when users have the
right permissions.
2023-02-17 14:07:02 +01:00
Javi Martín
d041d06809 Make officing specs detect bugs in the menu links
In commit baaec3a29 we started using the JavaScript driver in tests
dealing with the user menu, and made all tests pass.

However, we didn't update some officing tests that were also passing
when there was a bug in the code. That's because now that these tests
use a JavaScript driver, the link to "Polling officers" is never present
before pressing the "Menu" item. So tests checking the link isn't
present when loading the page always pass.
2021-10-06 13:48:03 +02:00
Javi Martín
92ddcb7aef Use JavaScript in system tests by default
JavaScript is used by about 98% of web users, so by testing without it
enabled, we're only testing that the application works for a very
reduced number of users.

We proceeded this way in the past because CONSUL started using Rails 4.2
and truncating the database between JavaScript tests with database
cleaner, which made these tests terribly slow.

When we upgraded to Rails 5.1 and introduced system tests, we started
using database transactions in JavaScript tests, making these tests much
faster. So now we can use JavaScript tests everywhere without critically
slowing down our test suite.
2021-04-07 14:41:06 +02:00
Javi Martín
baaec3a29c Use JavaScript in tests using the user menu
This way we click on the "menu" link first before clicking on any
sections, just like real users do.
2021-04-07 14:41:06 +02:00
taitus
9fe24aec9d Add sdg manager section to admin
Allow a user to become an sdg manager
2020-12-16 13:16:45 +01:00
Javi Martín
9427f01442 Use system specs instead of feature specs
We get rid of database cleaner, and JavaScript tests are faster because
between tests we now rollback transactions instead of truncating the
database.
2020-04-24 15:43:54 +02:00