8b73cfc019
There's a case where we would face a Cross-Site Scripting attack. An attacker could use the browser's developer tools to add (on their browser) a `<code>` tag with a `<script>` tag inside in the text of the draft version. After doing so, commenting on that text would result in the attacker's JavaScript being executed.
54 lines
1.5 KiB
Ruby
54 lines
1.5 KiB
Ruby
require "rails_helper"
|
|
|
|
describe "Cross-Site Scripting protection", :js do
|
|
let(:attack_code) { "<script>document.body.remove()</script>" }
|
|
|
|
scenario "valuators in admin investments index" do
|
|
hacker = create(:user, username: attack_code)
|
|
investment = create(:budget_investment, valuators: [create(:valuator, user: hacker)])
|
|
|
|
login_as(create(:administrator).user)
|
|
visit admin_budget_budget_investments_path(investment.budget)
|
|
|
|
expect(page.text).not_to be_empty
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "document title" do
|
|
process = create(:legislation_process)
|
|
create(:document, documentable: process, title: attack_code)
|
|
|
|
visit legislation_process_path(process)
|
|
|
|
expect(page.text).not_to be_empty
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "hacked translations" do
|
|
I18nContent.create(key: "admin.budget_investments.index.list.title", value: attack_code)
|
|
|
|
login_as(create(:administrator).user)
|
|
visit admin_budget_budget_investments_path(create(:budget_investment).budget)
|
|
|
|
expect(page.text).not_to be_empty
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "proposal actions in dashboard" do
|
|
proposal = create(:proposal)
|
|
|
|
create(:dashboard_action, description: attack_code)
|
|
|
|
login_as(proposal.author)
|
|
visit recommended_actions_proposal_dashboard_path(proposal)
|
|
|
|
expect(page.text).not_to be_empty
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "annotation context" do
|
|
annotation = create(:legislation_annotation)
|
|
annotation.update_column(:context, attack_code)
|
|
|
|
visit polymorphic_hierarchy_path(annotation)
|
|
|
|
expect(page.text).not_to be_empty
|
|
end
|
|
end
|