For the HashAlignment rule, we're using the default `key` style (keys are aligned and values aren't) instead of the `table` style (both keys and values are aligned) because, even if we used both in the application, we used the `key` style a lot more. Furthermore, the `table` style looks strange in places where there are both very long and very short keys and sometimes we weren't even consistent with the `table` style, aligning some keys without aligning other keys. Ideally we could align hashes to "either key or table", so developers can decide whether keeping the symmetry of the code is worth it in a case-per-case basis, but Rubocop doesn't allow this option.
375 lines
14 KiB
Ruby
375 lines
14 KiB
Ruby
require "rails_helper"
|
|
|
|
describe Legislation::Process do
|
|
let(:process) { create(:legislation_process) }
|
|
|
|
it_behaves_like "acts as paranoid", :legislation_process
|
|
it_behaves_like "globalizable", :legislation_process
|
|
|
|
it "is valid" do
|
|
expect(process).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "dynamically validates the color format" do
|
|
stub_const("#{Legislation::Process}::CSS_HEX_COLOR", /[G-H]{2}/)
|
|
|
|
expect(build(:legislation_process, font_color: "GG", background_color: "GH")).to be_valid
|
|
expect(build(:legislation_process, font_color: "#ff0", background_color: "#00f")).not_to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "assigns default values to new processes" do
|
|
process = Legislation::Process.new
|
|
|
|
expect(process.background_color).to be_present
|
|
expect(process.font_color).to be_present
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "dates validations" do
|
|
it "is invalid if draft is enabled but draft_start_date is not present" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, draft_phase_enabled: true, draft_start_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:draft_start_date]).to include("can't be blank")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if draft is enabled but draft_end_date is not present" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, draft_phase_enabled: true, draft_end_date: "")
|
|
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:draft_end_date]).to include("can't be blank")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if debate phase is enabled but debate_start_date is not present" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, debate_phase_enabled: true, debate_start_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:debate_start_date]).to include("can't be blank")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if debate phase is enabled but debate_end_date is not present" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, debate_phase_enabled: true, debate_end_date: "")
|
|
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:debate_end_date]).to include("can't be blank")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if proposals phase is enabled but proposals_phase_start_date is not present" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, proposals_phase_enabled: true, proposals_phase_start_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:proposals_phase_start_date]).to include("can't be blank")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if proposals phase is enabled but proposals_phase_end_date is not present" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, proposals_phase_enabled: true, proposals_phase_end_date: "")
|
|
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:proposals_phase_end_date]).to include("can't be blank")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if allegations phase is enabled but allegations_start_date is not present" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, allegations_phase_enabled: true,
|
|
allegations_start_date: nil,)
|
|
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:allegations_start_date]).to include("can't be blank")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if allegations phase is enabled but allegations_end_date is not present" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, allegations_phase_enabled: true, allegations_end_date: "")
|
|
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:allegations_end_date]).to include("can't be blank")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is valid if start dates are missing and the phase is disabled" do
|
|
draft_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
draft_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
draft_start_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
debate_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
debate_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
debate_start_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
proposals_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
proposals_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
proposals_phase_start_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
allegations_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
allegations_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
allegations_start_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
expect(draft_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(debate_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(proposals_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(allegations_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is valid if end dates are missing and the phase is disabled" do
|
|
draft_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
draft_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
draft_end_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
debate_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
debate_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
debate_end_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
proposals_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
proposals_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
proposals_phase_end_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
allegations_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
allegations_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
allegations_end_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
expect(draft_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(debate_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(proposals_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(allegations_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is valid if start and end dates are missing and the phase is disabled" do
|
|
draft_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
draft_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
draft_start_date: nil,
|
|
draft_end_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
debate_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
debate_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
debate_start_date: nil,
|
|
debate_end_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
proposals_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
proposals_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
proposals_phase_start_date: nil,
|
|
proposals_phase_end_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
allegations_disabled = build(:legislation_process,
|
|
allegations_phase_enabled: false,
|
|
allegations_start_date: nil,
|
|
allegations_end_date: nil)
|
|
|
|
expect(draft_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(debate_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(proposals_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
expect(allegations_disabled).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "date ranges validations" do
|
|
it "is invalid if end_date is before start_date" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, start_date: Date.current,
|
|
end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:end_date]).to include("must be on or after the start date")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is valid if end_date is the same as start_date" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, start_date: Date.current - 1.day,
|
|
end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
|
|
expect(process).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is valid if debate_end_date is the same as debate_start_date" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, debate_start_date: Date.current - 1.day,
|
|
debate_end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
|
|
expect(process).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if debate_end_date is before debate_start_date" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, debate_start_date: Date.current,
|
|
debate_end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:debate_end_date])
|
|
.to include("must be on or after the debate start date")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is valid if draft_end_date is the same as draft_start_date" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, draft_start_date: Date.current - 1.day,
|
|
draft_end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
|
|
expect(process).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if draft_end_date is before draft_start_date" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, draft_start_date: Date.current,
|
|
draft_end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:draft_end_date])
|
|
.to include("must be on or after the draft start date")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is invalid if allegations_end_date is before allegations_start_date" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, allegations_start_date: Date.current,
|
|
allegations_end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
|
|
expect(process).to be_invalid
|
|
expect(process.errors.messages[:allegations_end_date])
|
|
.to include("must be on or after the comments start date")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "is valid if allegations_end_date is the same as allegations_start_date" do
|
|
process = build(:legislation_process, allegations_start_date: Date.current - 1.day,
|
|
allegations_end_date: Date.current - 1.day)
|
|
expect(process).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "filter scopes" do
|
|
describe "open and past filters" do
|
|
let!(:process_1) do
|
|
create(:legislation_process, start_date: Date.current - 2.days, end_date: Date.current + 1.day)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
let!(:process_2) do
|
|
create(:legislation_process, start_date: Date.current + 1.day, end_date: Date.current + 3.days)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
let!(:process_3) do
|
|
create(:legislation_process, start_date: Date.current - 4.days, end_date: Date.current - 3.days)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "filters open" do
|
|
open_processes = ::Legislation::Process.open
|
|
|
|
expect(open_processes).to eq [process_1]
|
|
expect(open_processes).not_to include [process_2]
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "filters past" do
|
|
past_processes = ::Legislation::Process.past
|
|
|
|
expect(past_processes).to eq [process_3]
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "filters draft phase" do
|
|
process_before_draft = create(
|
|
:legislation_process,
|
|
draft_start_date: Date.current - 3.days,
|
|
draft_end_date: Date.current - 2.days
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
process_with_draft_disabled = create(
|
|
:legislation_process,
|
|
draft_start_date: Date.current - 2.days,
|
|
draft_end_date: Date.current + 2.days,
|
|
draft_phase_enabled: false
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
process_with_draft_enabled = create(
|
|
:legislation_process,
|
|
draft_start_date: Date.current - 2.days,
|
|
draft_end_date: Date.current + 2.days,
|
|
draft_phase_enabled: true
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
process_with_draft_only_today = create(
|
|
:legislation_process,
|
|
draft_start_date: Date.current,
|
|
draft_end_date: Date.current,
|
|
draft_phase_enabled: true
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
processes_not_in_draft = ::Legislation::Process.not_in_draft
|
|
|
|
expect(processes_not_in_draft).to match_array [process_before_draft, process_with_draft_disabled]
|
|
expect(processes_not_in_draft).not_to include(process_with_draft_enabled)
|
|
expect(processes_not_in_draft).not_to include(process_with_draft_only_today)
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "#status" do
|
|
it "detects planned phase" do
|
|
process.update!(start_date: Date.current + 2.days)
|
|
expect(process.status).to eq(:planned)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "detects closed phase" do
|
|
process.update!(end_date: Date.current - 2.days)
|
|
expect(process.status).to eq(:closed)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "detects open phase" do
|
|
expect(process.status).to eq(:open)
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "Header colors" do
|
|
it "valid format colors" do
|
|
process1 = create(:legislation_process, background_color: "123", font_color: "#fff")
|
|
process2 = create(:legislation_process, background_color: "#fff", font_color: "123")
|
|
process3 = create(:legislation_process, background_color: "", font_color: "")
|
|
process4 = create(:legislation_process, background_color: "#abf123", font_color: "fff123")
|
|
expect(process1).to be_valid
|
|
expect(process2).to be_valid
|
|
expect(process3).to be_valid
|
|
expect(process4).to be_valid
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "invalid format colors" do
|
|
expect do
|
|
create(:legislation_process, background_color: "#123ghi", font_color: "#fff")
|
|
end.to raise_error(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid, "Validation failed: Background color is invalid")
|
|
|
|
expect do
|
|
create(:legislation_process, background_color: "#fff", font_color: "ggg")
|
|
end.to raise_error(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid, "Validation failed: Font color is invalid")
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe "milestone_tags" do
|
|
context "without milestone_tags" do
|
|
let(:process) { create(:legislation_process) }
|
|
|
|
it "do not have milestone_tags" do
|
|
expect(process.milestone_tag_list).to eq([])
|
|
expect(process.milestone_tags).to eq([])
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "add a new milestone_tag" do
|
|
process.milestone_tag_list = "tag1,tag2"
|
|
|
|
expect(process.milestone_tag_list).to eq(["tag1", "tag2"])
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
context "with milestone_tags" do
|
|
let(:process) { create(:legislation_process, :with_milestone_tags) }
|
|
|
|
it "has milestone_tags" do
|
|
expect(process.reload.milestone_tag_list.count).to eq(1)
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
describe ".search" do
|
|
let!(:traffic) do
|
|
create(:legislation_process,
|
|
title: "Traffic regulation",
|
|
summary: "Lane structure",
|
|
description: "From top to bottom")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
let!(:animal_farm) do
|
|
create(:legislation_process,
|
|
title: "Hierarchy structure",
|
|
summary: "Pigs at the top",
|
|
description: "Napoleon in charge of the traffic")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "returns only matching polls" do
|
|
expect(Legislation::Process.search("lane")).to eq [traffic]
|
|
expect(Legislation::Process.search("pigs")).to eq [animal_farm]
|
|
expect(Legislation::Process.search("nothing here")).to be_empty
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "gives more weight to name" do
|
|
expect(Legislation::Process.search("traffic")).to eq [traffic, animal_farm]
|
|
expect(Legislation::Process.search("structure")).to eq [animal_farm, traffic]
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it "gives more weight to summary than description" do
|
|
expect(Legislation::Process.search("top")).to eq [animal_farm, traffic]
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|