68927409b6
The `inverted-selection` rules defined in the `%brand-background` selector weren't being applied because we were using this selector in `::before` and `::after` pseudoelements. Not sure about the reason, but it looks like the saturation of `::after::selection` pseudoelements resulted in invalid selectors and so the inverted selection rules were ignored for every selection using `%brand-background`, like `%budget-header`. Using `@include brand-background` instead of `@extend %brand-background` in pseudoelements solves the issue. The inverted selection might not work in these pseudoelements, but we don't need it there since these pseudoelements don't have content.
24 lines
361 B
SCSS
24 lines
361 B
SCSS
.single-heading {
|
|
margin-bottom: $line-height * 2;
|
|
padding-bottom: $line-height;
|
|
position: relative;
|
|
|
|
&::after {
|
|
@include brand-background;
|
|
bottom: 0;
|
|
content: "";
|
|
height: rem-calc(6);
|
|
position: absolute;
|
|
width: 20%;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
h2 {
|
|
font-size: rem-calc(60);
|
|
font-weight: normal;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
p {
|
|
font-size: rem-calc(48);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|