The group is automatically assigned when we assign the heading. The
budget isn't needed either, except for a special case related to the
reason to be rejected.
While it could be argued we're hiding the real way we've defined
associations in our models, the tests are so much easier to read when we
don't have so many lines just creating data.
Furthermore, developers who care about vertically aligning the code will
be glad to see some variables disrupting this alignment are now gone.
We barely use this trait. In the votation type spec we're probably using
it wrong, and in the answer spec we assume one of the answers is going
to be "Yes".
The name `yes_no` is more expressive, since it makes it clear what the
answers are.
This data is obsolete since commit 9d1ca3bf.
Note we should have probably moved the test to the model, since now the
`to_csv` method isn't tested anywhwere, and we should probably add a
test in the future. The code now uses the new DownloadSetting model,
though, making it hard to test.
These feature tests were taking too long, we can't run them for every
single model.
I'm taking the approach of using one different model for each test, but
in theory only using a few models covering every possible scenario
would be enough.
This is a mistake I made in commit f2ef27d3. Back then I thought we
needed to keep Globalize.locale and I18n.locale in sync, but the truth
is it automatically happens when setting Globalize.locale to nil.
So now we can use I18n.with_locale (at least in the tests) and forget
about Globalize, which will make it easier to switch to Mobility in the
future.
Now factories define default headings for investments, so there's no
need to create a group and a heading to create an investment.
Likewise, in order to create a heading it isn't necessary to specify a
group anymore; specifying the budget is enough.
It's possible that there are more similar cases we haven't simplified
yet; I'm only addressing the obvious ones.
Settings are stored in the database, and so any changes to the settings
done during the tests are automatically rolled back between one test and
the next one.
There were also a few places where we weren't using an `after` block but
changing the setting at the end of the test.
While the test should work without this assertion, the intention of the
test is to check what happens if a user selects and investment and, once
it's selected, clicks the "next" link.
When we were inserting a row or replacing an existing one (just like we
do when we click the link to select an investment), we were entering a
row containing all columns, and all of them were displayed even if they
had been excluded using the column selector.
This caused the table to move in a strange way, which sometimes made the
investment selection tests fail.
In JavaScript, when there isn't a `break` or `return` statement inside a
`switch` case, the next case will be executed as well.
That wasn't a problem here because CoffeeScript automatically inserts a
`return` statement in this specific situation. However, since we don't
want to return the result of the `hide()` operation, it might be easy to
accidentally remove the `return` statement, causing the code to break.
I've added a test for the scenario where neither `break` nor `return`
statements are present, so we don't run into this error.
This number was not the important one; the important one is the one
given by the recounts.
Note we're also removing the votes by date, since they're also system
votes.
System count isn't a relevant number because the important one is the
number of votes counted by poll officers. We're still maintaining it for
a month in case poll officers would like to review the results.
The `type: :feature` is automatically detected by RSpec because these
tests are inside the `spec/features` folder. Using `feature` re-adds a
`type: :feature` to these files, which will result in a conflict when we
upgrade to Rails 5.1's system tests.
Because of this change, we also need to change `background` to `before`
or else these tests will fail.
We're also adding a rubocop rule so we dont' accidentally add these
keywords again.
- Add new translations on SignatureSheet show page.
Changes:
-> "document number" to "sigantures"
-> "documents" to "users"
- Remove unused translations from the others yml
- In the previous version, each signature was equivalent to a document
and we separated them by commas.
Now each signature may also need the fields birth date and postal code.
So we separated each signature with a semicolon and separated each of
its fields by commas.
Example old version: "12345678X, 87654321Y"
Example new version:
"12345678X, 31/12/1980, 28001; 87654321Y, 31/12/1981, 28002"
- Update translations:
"Write the numbers separated by commas (,)" to
"Write the numbers separated by semicolons (;)"
This new functionality will allow to retrieve in the signature sheet
the document number, the date of birth and the postal code.
So we renamed :document_numbers to :required_fields_to_veriry to
clarify and adjust the name to its use.
