This method is ambiguous. Sometimes we use it to set invalid data in
tests (which can usually be done with `update_column`), and other times
we use it instead of `update!`.
I'm removing it because, even if sometimes it could make sense to use
it, it's too similar to `update_attributes` (which is an alias for
`update` and runs validations), making it confusing.
However, there's one case where we're still using it: in the
ActsAsParanoidAliases module, we need to invoke the callbacks, which
`update_column` skips, but tests related to translations fail if we use
`update!`. The reason for this is the tests check what happens if we
restore a record without restoring its translations. But that will make
the record invalid, since there's a validation rule checking it has at
least one translation.
I'm not blacklisting any other method which skips validations because we
know they skip validations and use them anyway (hopefully with care).
We were very inconsistent regarding these rules.
Personally I prefer no empty lines around blocks, clases, etc... as
recommended by the Ruby style guide [1], and they're the default values
in rubocop, so those are the settings I'm applying.
The exception is the `private` access modifier, since we were leaving
empty lines around it most of the time. That's the default rubocop rule
as well. Personally I don't have a strong preference about this one.
[1] https://rubystyle.guide/#empty-lines-around-bodies
This is a very subtle behaviour: `match /attachment/i` could represent a
regular expression, but it could also represent a division like
`match / attachment / i`. So we need to make an exception to the usual
way we omit parenthesis in RSpec expectations.
The `type: :feature` is automatically detected by RSpec because these
tests are inside the `spec/features` folder. Using `feature` re-adds a
`type: :feature` to these files, which will result in a conflict when we
upgrade to Rails 5.1's system tests.
Because of this change, we also need to change `background` to `before`
or else these tests will fail.
JS modals/browser alerts are not automatically accepted now with
Selenium, events that trigger such events must be wrapped in one
of the following methods: `accept_alert`, `accept_confirm` or
`dismiss_confirm`
Why:
Both Newsletters and Email Downloads need the same logic: To extract the
emails from all the users in the segment that have newsletter flag
active, removing all empty email values.
How:
1- UserSegments#user_segment_emails holds that repeated logic and is used
on both Newsletter & EmailDownload.
2- Rename Newsletter#list_of_recipients to list_of_recipient_emails as
it is more descriptive. There is no need to pass entire Users around,
only the emails are needed at Mailer#newsletter method.
3- Cleanup Newsletter#list_of_recipient_emails model spec scenario
Why:
User with an empty email value (nil) should not appear in the recipient
list for a given UserSegment at Newsletters or Email Downloads.
How:
Using Enumerable#compact and Enumerable#select to filter out empty emails
Increasing Email Download feature spec and Newsletter model spec to cover
all possible scenarios including the nil email one.
Why:
Newsletter attribute `segment_recipient` is an integer to be used as
enum. There's no advantage to store a number instead of an string if the
ammount of elements in the table is not going to be huge, or we can take
advantage of using an enum.
Also maintaining both Newsletters enum paired with UserSegments::SEGMENTS
would be a maintenance burden.
How:
* Migration to change segment_recipient column from integer to string
* Removing enumeration from Newsletter model class
* Using UserSegments::SEGMENTS instead of Newsletter.segment_recipients
or integer values
