The same way we did for banners.
We needed to add new translation keys so the labels are displayed in the
correct language. I've kept the original `title` and `body` attributes
so they can be used in other places.
While backporting, we also added the original translations because they
hadn't been backported yet.
This change forces us to use nested attributes for translations, instead
of using the more convenient `:"title_#{locale}"` methods.
On the other hand, we can use Rails' native `_destroy` attribute to
remove existing translations, so we don't have to use our custom
`delete_translations`, which was a bit buggy since it didn't consider
failed updates.
The `update` action is usually expected to behave the same way it does
everywhere else, which is updating a record using the `params` hash.
The name `toggle_select` comes from the name we use in a similar
situation for budget investments.
Just like it's done everywhere else in the application. Not doing so
means users who aren't logged in receive a "you aren't authorized"
message when they try to create a new legislation proposal instead of
being redirected to the login page.
We were expecting translation parameters in legislation processes
`update` action. However, those parameters aren't sent when we get to
that action through the "proposals" tab.
By doing so and including it in ActionDispatch::Routing::UrlFor, we make
it available in controllers, helpers and specs, and so we can remove the
duplication we had there with methods dealing with the same problem.
Even if monkey-patching is ugly, using a different module and executing
ActionDispatch::Routing::UrlFor.send(:include, MyModule) wouldn't make
the method available in the controller.
If we ignore all params that are blank, there is no way to
"remove" an attribute (i.e. change its value to blank)
On the other hand, we don't want to create new translations
where all fields are empty, so the new code keeps only the
blank fields which belong to existing translations.
I've moved the method to the User model in order to make it easier to
test. I'm not sure where it belongs, though.
There was already a failing spec in `spec/features/management_spec.rb`,
but it passed if run standalone because it only failed if previous tests
had already created nine users or more.
