Note we're making the validation rule dynamic so it's affected by the
way we stub the constant in the tests to emulate data created in old
applications.
Co-Authored-By: Javi Martín <javim@elretirao.net>
Previously the draft mode was a phase of the PB, but that had some
limitations.
Now the phase drafting disappears and therefore the PB can have the
status published or not published (in draft mode).
That will give more flexibility in order to navigate through the
different phases and see how it looks for administrators before
publishing the PB and everybody can see.
By default, the PB is always created in draft mode, so it gives you
the flexibility to adjust and modify anything before publishing it.
We're going to add help content here and having a floating button would
make the button disappear when creating content for mobile phones.
I'm not sure having the link in the <header> tag is semantically
correct, but is consistent to what we did to create local targets in the
SDG content section.
Note we're changing the style of the link to create local targets so
it's consistent with the link to create budgets/groups/headings.
The color #fff provides higher contrast, which can cause problems to
users who experience migraines with bright colors or dyslexic users who
might see some kind of shadows around the text because of the bright
color.
So even if it isn't a big improvement, we're slighty reducing the
contrast in order to slightly reduce this problem.
We were displaying the total number of notifications with a message "You
have N unread notifications", but were using the total number of
notifications instead of the unread ones.
It was hard to know where the numbers were coming from; they depended on
the padding of the link and the size of the notification icon size. So
we're using variables to make it more explicit.
However, the code is now too complex, so we'll probably have to simplify
it in the future.
Other than simplifying the view, we can write tests using `click_link`,
which makes the tests more robust. Clicking the `.icon-notification`
element was causing some tests to fail when defining a window height of
750 pixels in the `admin_budgets` branch.
Hopefully now it's a bit more obvious that SDGs can be selected by
clicking on them and that the field to select goals and the field to
select targets/goals are related (since they're now part of the same
fieldset).
We were using list items with the checkbox role. This is probably
confusing since list items have a listitem role, and so we were
basically using a list with no listitem.
We could add a `<span role="checkbox">` tag inside the list item, but
using real checkboxes is probably easier. We're also adding a test to
verify the checkboxes native behavior is compatible with our code.
Note we're using the "enter" key to toggle the "checked" status of the
SDG. This is probably not intuitive for screen reader users who might
try to submit the form using the "enter" key after selecting a goal.
However, the alternative would be even less intuitive for sighted
keyboard users, since for them these icons look like links or buttons
and they would accidentally submit the form when trying to select a
goal.
Since we haven't come up with a better interface yet, for now we're
following the principle of least damage; we consider submitting the form
against a user's will is less annoying than forcing users to move to a
different field before being able to submit the form.
Also note we can't write `check` in the tests because Capybara will try
to click the checkbox, which is hidden by the image in the label.
These styles were broken in commit 2614de79c, since there we only
considered scenarios where the `tags` element is a list. In these forms, however, the `tags` element is a regular <div> tag.
Since we've changed the facebook and twitter login icons, it makes sense
to use the same icons in social share links.
Besides, using font-awesome simplifies the code and prevents problems
with screen readers announcing the value of the `content:` CSS property.
We were using the icon for google plus, which was confusing since google
plus no longer exists.
Note this change requires changing the font for these icons, since the
google icon is not present in the "icons" font. On the plus side, using
the font awesome icons we can simplify the code a little bit.
We had one exception running test suite [1]:
```
1) Commenting legislation questions Merged comment threads View
comments of annotations in an included range
Failure/Error: count: annotation.comments.roots.count) %>
ActionView::Template::Error:
PG::ProtocolViolation: ERROR: bind message supplies 0
parameters, but prepared statement "" requires 2
: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "comments" WHERE "comments"."hidden_at" IS
NULL AND "comments"."commentable_id" = $1 AND
"comments"."commentable_type" = $2 AND "comments"."ancestry" IS NULL
```
Debugging shows this test was run right after the flaggable specs.
There's a chance these exceptions take place because the test is
accessing the database after the browser (chromedriver) process has
already accessed the database.
This is just an attempt at fixing the issue; I don't know whether these
changes will fix it since I've only seen this exception on Github
Actions (never on my machine). Worst case scenario, we're encouraging
good practices of system tests: test things from the user's point of
view.
[1] https://github.com/consul/consul/runs/1856245992
Using a button tag, it's possible for every user to "click" the element.
Besides, we don't need to call the `preventDefault` function, because
buttons with type "button" don't do anything by default.
