There's no need to check again headers in this scenario, previous one
already does it.
Correctly naming variables, as well as using explicit expectations is a
good idea.
Last but not least, expectations where reversed but by luck or lack of
attention where passing.
The created investment didn't had all data to correctly assert each
column values are correctly exported.
The expectations checking if each particular text appears are invalid in
this test. The objective is to check that the downloaded file contents
are exactly as they should be... not particular parts checked in an
independent way as for example "Yes" could appear in two different
columns and just looking if the text appears is not a valid assertion.
Rebase master branch so that this PR can
be updated with the latest changes.
Conflicts has been solved and some specs
updated to fit the new changes. dev_seeds
has been also adapted to the new format.
Why:
Heading filter where not being correctly displayed
How:
Increasing scenario to cover all possible combinations, and fixing the
heading_filters method of the Valuation Budget Investment Controller to
correctly:
* Find how many investments the valuator can access
* Count investments for each heading
When there are no budgets we were seeing an exception in the budgets’
index
There are two parts to take into account here:
1) Making sure there is a current_budget present, otherwise we display
the “no budgets” message
2) The map helper is called from the controller, so we need to make
sure current_budget is present there too
Note: We could have added a bunch of `try` statements in the budgets’s
index, instead of using a conditional, however there are quite a few
`current_budget` calls so it seems more appropriate to use a conditional
Not sure how this error creeped in 😕 probably a new gem version or
other conflicting code
The problem was we were getting an `unpermitted param email` when
updating a user’s email address
This stackoverflow solution seems to work nicely 😌https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17384289/unpermitted-parameters-addi
ng-new-fields-to-devise-in-rails-4-0#answer-19036427
The tests that will check the featute
is working well added. There are four test:
1. Checks that the emails are been send to
the user. The test looks for the link in there
and takes the token. Visits the page and
changes the password.
2 and 3. Both change the password by hand. One
uses a password written by the manager, whilst
the other uses the 'Generate random password'
option. Both tests check that the user can
sign in with the new passwords.
4. Checks that the password can be printed
when it is saved.
The now-deprecated `.trigger('click')` API simulated a click against
the DOM rather a click on the UI, which made our tests fragile and
wouldn't simulate actual user interaction
Advanced search scenarios for Budget::Investments, Debates and
Proposals need proper date formatting as they behave unexpectedly
when APIs such as `7.days.ago` are used
JS modals/browser alerts are not automatically accepted now with
Selenium, events that trigger such events must be wrapped in one
of the following methods: `accept_alert`, `accept_confirm` or
`dismiss_confirm`
