The same it's done in the UN official SDG pages.
We could try to split the string on a space which is more or less in the
middle. However, this wouldn't work on languages which don't have spaces
between works, like Chinese.
So in the end I've added a new translation key, where the title is
supposed to be split in several lines the same way it's done by the UN.
The same way it's done in the official SDG icons. We're also using
uppercase with slightly smaller letter spacing for the same reason.
Even though we didn't do so in the past, we're moving the font to its
own folder inside the vendor folder and including the license file as
well in order to make it clear that these files do not follow the same
license CONSUL uses.
We were jumping from h1 to h3 and some of these sections (cards and
processes) had h3 tags inside them.
My best guess is we were using h3 so the titles were smaller. So I'm
adding a CSS mixin to easily use a font size of a different heading tag.
We were having some style issues when adding the processes feed to the
goal view because of this lack of separation.
We're using a <section> tag so it's clear where the <header> tag belongs
to.
They were all following the same format.
Note we need to group the `see_all` translation keys together (the same
way it's done with the `most_active` keys) so we don't have an unused
translation warning.
We're also moving the "see all" link in processes outside the feed
content; the same way it's done in debates and proposals and removing
unnecessary classes in the processes feed: the column class is causing
the processes not to be aligned with the debates above them, and the
margin bottom is not needed because the margin of the footer is already
enough.
Note we're using the code instead of the ID to get the goal in the URL.
IMHO this is what most people would expect; visiting a URL with a "7"
takes you to SDG number 7, and not to the one with "7" as a database ID.
In order to avoid tests (either automated tests or manual tests) passing
by coincidence due to the goal ID and the goal code being the same, I'm
shuffling the codes before entering them in the databse.
I've tried using `resolve` in the routes so the code is automatically
taken into account, but it doesn't work since `resolve` cannot be used
inside a namespace, and here we're within the `sdg` namespace.
On production environments the application wasn't loading because
the `SDG::Manager` class was defined in two places. We don't know
the exact reasons for the conflict and why these changes fix it.
Note using `params[:relatable_type].classify` is recognized as a
security risk by some tools. However, it's a false positive, since we've
added constraints to the URL so that paramenter can only have the values
we trust.
