While it could be argued we're hiding the real way we've defined
associations in our models, the tests are so much easier to read when we
don't have so many lines just creating data.
Furthermore, developers who care about vertically aligning the code will
be glad to see some variables disrupting this alignment are now gone.
We barely use this trait. In the votation type spec we're probably using
it wrong, and in the answer spec we assume one of the answers is going
to be "Yes".
The name `yes_no` is more expressive, since it makes it clear what the
answers are.
One test was testing regular users can't access results, and another one
was testing neither regular users nor managers can. So the second test
can just test the admin scenario, and we're still covering everything.
We were performing an AJAX request and then a "normal" request without
checking the AJAX request had finished. Sometimes it resulted in the
normal request finishing because the AJAX request did, causing the test
to fail.
The `type: :feature` is automatically detected by RSpec because these
tests are inside the `spec/features` folder. Using `feature` re-adds a
`type: :feature` to these files, which will result in a conflict when we
upgrade to Rails 5.1's system tests.
Because of this change, we also need to change `background` to `before`
or else these tests will fail.
We're also adding a rubocop rule so we dont' accidentally add these
keywords again.
In Rails 5.1, calling `travel_to` inside another `travel_to` block will
result in a RuntimeError:
> Calling `travel_to` with a block, when we have previously already made
> a call to `travel_to`, can lead to confusing time stubbing.
The `type: :feature` is automatically detected by RSpec because these
tests are inside the `spec/features` folder. Using `feature` re-adds a
`type: :feature` to these files, which will result in a conflict when we
upgrade to Rails 5.1's system tests.
Because of this change, we also need to change `background` to `before`
or else these tests will fail.
We are trying to avoid Officers from forgetting to click the “Confirm
vote” button, which is necessary to keep track of who has voted a Poll
To do that, we are not displaying the menu item to go back to the next
person that wants to vote, until the Officer clicks the “Confirm Vote”
button or the “The user has decided not to vote” button
Note: Due to mobile version we have duplicate ids, so using classes for
the menu items to hide them without errors
Note2: We are only hidding the menu item, if there are votable polls,
otherwise the “Confirm vote” button does not appear, and there is no
way of going back to help the next person that wants to vote
We needed to bring back support for CKEditor in our translatable form,
which we had temporarily remove.
And now we support CKEditor in our translatable specs, and so we can
remove the duplicated specs for poll question answers.
This required changing the `voted_before_sign_in` slightly in order to
change what the method returns if the user signed in and voted at the
exact same microsecond.
It doesn't affect production code because it would be impossible for the
user to do both things at the same time.
As a side effect, the method now returns what the method name suggests.
Before this change, the correct method name would have been
`voted_before_or_at_the_same_time_of_sign_in`.
As a less desirable side effect, in the tests now we need to make sure
at least one second passes between the moment a user votes and the
moment a user signs in again. One microsecond wouldn't work because
the method `travel_to` automatically sets microseconds to zero in order
to avoid rounding issues.
