Many developers run `bin/rspec` and then are (reasonably) confused when
running the tests takes too long.
So we're clarifying that running the whole test suite should be done
using a CI, and only relevant tests should be run while developing on
your machine.
When this code was added, in commit 1a20a3ce4, we had no validation
rules checking the presence of the start and end dates of a poll. Now we
do, so we don't have to check this condition in the view.
The rows in these tables were using the styles from the `.poll`
selector, and the `position: relative` property defined there caused the
inner borders to disappear in some browsers (like Firefox).
So we're adding the `public` class to the selector; this way, it doesn't
affect elements in the admin section.
Even though it's only necessary to add the `.public` prefix to the
`.poll` selector in one place in order to fix this issue, we're doing it
everywhere for consistency.
We were using a redundant `elsif` instead of an `else`. We were also
using a negative condition in the main `if`, which made the code a bit
harder to read.
Since we usually use `current_user` instead of `user_signed_in?`, we're
also changing that for consistency.Extract component to render the status of a poll
This is consistent with the way we've got partials to render debates,
proposals and legislation processes on their index pages.
Note that, while adding the tests for the status icon, we're keeping one
system test because it also tests the process of voting. We're adding a
new, similar component test, where the voter is created in the database,
so all possible statuses are tested in the component.
With this parameter, Vimeo no longer uses cookies that identifies users
browsing our site.
They do still store some cookies, though; quoting from Vimeo player
parameters overview:
> When DNT is enabled, Vimeo deploys one essential cookie via the
> embeddable player:
> The __cf_bm cookie, which is part of Cloudflare's Bot Management
> service and helps mitigate risk associated with spam and bot traffic.
Not sure whether this counts as essential cookies in our case; they're
essential for Vimeo, but for us, they're third-party cookies, after all.
[1] https://help.vimeo.com/hc/en-us/articles/12426260232977-Player-parameters-overview
When embedding a video in our site YouTube stores cookies in the user's
computer that aren't necessary to watch the video, so we'd have to make
people accept those cookies before letting them watch the video.
Using a URL that doesn't use cookies, like mentioned in YouTube Help
[1], is easier, though, and respects people's privacy without affecting
the user experience.
That I've found some references saying that youtube does store cookies
once you hit the "play" button even when using the nocookie server [2].
Not sure whether that's an old behavior or I'm doing something wrong,
but I don't see this is the case; even after playing the video, cookies
aren't stored on my browser.
[1] https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/171780#zippy=%2Cturn-on-privacy-enhanced-mode
[2] https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/youtubes-new-nocookie-feature-continues-to-serve-cookies/
Now we're also testing that there's an iframe with the URL; before this
change, the test would pass even if the JavaScript generating the iframe
wouldn't work.
We were using the same code, and the same regular expressions, in two
places. To do so, we were including a helper inside a model, which is
something we don't usually do.
We had an inconsistency where most stylesheets associated to a component
would have the same relative path as their component, so if we had a
component in `app/components/admin/whatever`, its associated stylesheet
would be in `app/assets/stylesheets/admin/whatever`.
There was one exception to this rule: stylesheets for components in
`app/components/shared/` were placed in `app/assets/stylesheets/`. The
reason was that we thought "well... if they're in the root folder,
they're shared". However, this is confusing because in the root folder
there are also stylesheets that aren't associated to a component.
So we're creating the `app/assets/stylesheets/shared/` folder. This also
means we don't have to manually add every stylesheet in this folder the
the `application.scss` file.
We aren't the same for JavaScript files because with JavaScript we still
don't have a clear association between JavaScript files and components.
Only a couple of them (`advanced_search.js` and `check_all_none.js`)
would be good candidates, and the one for the advanced search form
doesn't even use the `.advanced-search-form` selector that we use in the
CSS file.
Although most Consul Democracy installations will only have a few
available languages using `config.i18n.available_locales`, there's a
chance some installation will keep every language as available and will
enable the desired ones using the admin interface. In these cases,
enabling (or disabling) every language would be tedious, particularly
when casually experimenting in a staging environment or while using the
official Consul Democracy demo.
So we're adding buttons to simplify the process. Since some
installations might have only a couple of available languages, and in
this case these buttons would be pretty much useless, we're only showing
them when there are many languages available.
These buttons only work without JavaScript, so we shouldn't show them in
this case.
I was wondering whether we should use the `hidden` HTML attribute so
these buttons don't show up when stylesheets haven't loaded either. Not
doing so because we already have a stylesheet for the <noscript>
scenario. We might change our minds regarding how to handle these styles
in the future.
The float property was removed in commit b71c61e40, but then it was
added again in commit 4a6313fed.
It might have been necessary to do so back then because we had a
`select` field instead of the links to set the order, but now, instead
of making them float on the left and then make the next element clear
the floats, we can do nothing and obtain the same results.
Since they're related, we're making them part of the same list. Instead
of finding a way to have the `Select` prefix they had as a label for the
list, we're including the "prefix" they had inside their texts, so the
text of a button doesn't need any additional context.
This code using the legislation-categories HTML class was removed in
commits d679c1eb7 and ff66909cd. We've noticed is while dealing with the
`.menu.simple` selectors in the previous commit.
People using screen readers usually expect links to take them somewhere
else in the page on to a different page, while they expect buttons to
change something on the page.
Since we're in the latter scenario, using a button is more accessible.
It's also more natural; with a button, we don't need to provide `#` as
the URL or stop the default event when the button is clicked. And,
unlike links, buttons can be activated with either the space or the
enter key. Finally, clicking a link pointing to `#` with the middle
mouse button opens a useless new tab, while buttons do nothing in this
case.
Now that we only have one "All" link on the page, we no longer need to
specify which "All" link we're clicking or which "All" link we are
checking, so we're simplifying the code doing so.
Since we don't usually style HTML classes starting with `js-`, we're
renaming it, so it's consistent with the `CheckAllNone` name used in the
`check_all_none.js` file.
Since we were on the "Pending review" filter, and there were no records
pending review, the code checking all checkboxes were checked/unchecked
didn't test anything because there were no checkboxes on the page.
So we're clicking on the "All" filter first.
This way we can simplify the view, particularly the form. However, we're
still adding some complexity to the form so inputs are inside labels and
so the collection is easier to style with CSS.
When the list of available languages becomes too large, having all of
them in one column makes it harder to select them.
What we're trying to do here is to have multiple columns, with each
column containing between 5 and 10 options, so they can all be easily
seen on the screen at the same time.
For that, there are mainly three options: a flex layout, a grid layout
or a multi-column layout.
Since languages are ordered (more or less) alphabetically, the natural
way to display them is showing the first few ones on the first column,
the following ones on the second column, and so on, as opposed to
displaying the first ones on the first row, the following ones on the
secord row, ... AFAIK this can't be accomplished using a flex layout.
I've tried to do so using a grid layout, and failed. The problem here is
that we don't know how many rows we're going to have.
So we're using a multi-column layout. I haven't found a way to guarantee
a minimum height for the content of each column, so in the end we're
using a hack with the `:has` pseudoclass. Note this pseudoclass is only
supported by about 92%-94% of the browsers (including the last few
versions of all major browsers); people using other browsers will still
see all the options on one column, just like people using small screens
do.
We're using different controls depending on the number of available
locales.
When there are only a few locales, the solution is obvious: radio
buttons to select the default language, and checkboxes to select the
available ones are simple and intuitive.
With many languages, showing two consecutive lists of 30 languages could
be confusing, though, particularly on small devices, where scrolling
through both lists could be hard.
So, in this case, we're rendering a <select> to choose the default
language. For selecting the available languages, however, we're sticking
to checkboxes because all the other existing options (like multiple
selects) are hard to use. We think it's OK because the form doesn't have
any additional fields, and there's only one big list of options to
scroll through.
While testing the application, we noticed that if we use the
`admin-fieldset-separator` styles when there's only one fieldset, it's
harder to notice that there's an additional field to select the default
language. So we're only using the `admin-fieldset-separator` styles when
all the fields are grouped in fieldsets.
Regarding the help text for the fieldset, if we leave the help text
outside the <legend> tag, people using screen readers won't hear about
this content. However, if we include it inside the <legend> tag, some
screen readers might read it every time they move to a different
checkbox (or radio button), which can be annoying. Since I don't think
these help messages are really essential, I'm leaving them out of the
<legend> tag. It's also easier to style them if they're outside the
<legend> tag.
Note we're using `display: table` for the labels, for the reasons
mentioned in commit 923c2a7ee.
Also note that, when there's only one available locale, this section is
useless. In this case, we aren't disabling it for now because there's a
chance people see it in the official Consul Democracy demo and then
wonder why it isn't available on their installation. We might disable it
in the future, though.
This is the admin section; it's obvious that every link in the menu will
take you to a page to manage something.
We're going to add a new item to either the "Settings" or the "Site
content" section, so it's a good time to improve what's already there.
Note that, for everything to work consistently, we need to make sure
that the default locale is one of the available locales.
Also note that we aren't overwriting the `#save ` method set by
globalize. I didn't feel too comfortable changing a monkey-patch which
ideally shouldn't be there in the first place, I haven't found a case
where `Globalize.locale` is `nil` (since it defaults to `I18n.locale`,
which should never be `nil`), so using `I18n.default_locale` probably
doesn't affect us.
We're only calling the `block_for` method from one place: the
`content_block` helper, and we're never passing the locale parameter to
that helper, which means we're always calling `block_for` using
`I18n.locale`.
So I'm not sure why we were doing the `locale ||=` assignment, since
`I18n.locale` doesn't return nil.
In any case, since this was added in commit c1de2dced, Ruby has added
support for arguments forwarding, so we can use it here to simplify the
code a little bit.
Note that, currently, we take these settings from the database but we
don't provide a way to edit them through the admin interface, so the
locales must be manually introduced through a Rails console.
While we did consider using a comma-separated list, we're using spaces
in order to be consistent with the way we store the allowed content
types settings.
The `enabled_locales` nomenclature, which contrasts with
`available_locales`, is probably subconsciously based on similar
patterns like the one Nginx uses to enable sites.
Note that we aren't using `Setting.enabled_locales` in the globalize
initializer when setting the fallbacks. This means the following test
(which we could add to the shared globalizable examples) would fail:
```
it "Falls back to an enabled locale if the fallback is not enabled" do
Setting["locales.default"] = "en"
Setting["locales.enabled"] = "fr en"
allow(I18n.fallbacks).to receive(:[]).and_return([:fr, :es])
Globalize.set_fallbacks_to_all_available_locales
I18n.with_locale(:fr) do
expect(record.send(attribute)).to eq "In English"
end
end
```
The reason is that the code making this test pass could be:
```
def Globalize.set_fallbacks_to_all_available_locales
Globalize.fallbacks = I18n.available_locales.index_with do |locale|
((I18n.fallbacks[locale] & Setting.enabled_locales) + Setting.enabled_locales).uniq
end
end
```
However, this would make it impossible to run `rake db:migrate` on new
applications because the initializer would try to load the `Setting`
model but the `settings` table wouldn't exist at that point.
Besides, this is a really rare case that IMHO we don't need to support.
For this scenario, an installation would have to enable a locale, create
records with contents in that locale, then disable that locale and have
that locale as a fallback for a language where content for that record
wasn't created. If that happened, it would be solved by creating content
for that record in every enabled language.
We were defining one builder in the `app/lib/` folder and another one
inside a helper module.
So now we're grouping them together. This way we're following the "one
class per file" convention that we follow most of the time. And, by
extracting the `TranslatableFormBuilder` class to its own file, it'll be
easier to add tests for it.
Note that, for consistency, we're renaming the
`TranslationsFieldsBuilder` class so it ends in `FormBuilder`.
In the case of the `edit` action, we're using
`load_and_authorize_resource`, which will always return a
`SiteCustomization::ContentBlock`. In the case of
`edit_heading_content_block`, we're using `Budget::ContentBlock.find`,
which always returns a `Budget::ContentBlock` (or raises an exception).
So, in both cases, the condition to assign `@selected_content_block` can
be removed.
The code works without this action because both the route and the view
are specified, and by default Rails renders the view when there's no
action defined.
However, the code is easier to understand if the action is present in
the controller, which is what we do most of the time.
There was an edge case where a user could configure a locale and then
the application would change the locales to that one would no longer be
available. In that case, we were getting a `I18n::InvalidLocale`
exception when accessing the subscriptions page.
So now, we're defaulting to `I18n.locale`. Note we're using
`I18n.locale`instead of `I18n.default_locale` because `set_user_locale`
is called inside the `switch_locale` block in `ApplicationController`,
which already sets `I18n.locale` based on `I18n.default_locale`.
