We were very inconsistent regarding these rules.
Personally I prefer no empty lines around blocks, clases, etc... as
recommended by the Ruby style guide [1], and they're the default values
in rubocop, so those are the settings I'm applying.
The exception is the `private` access modifier, since we were leaving
empty lines around it most of the time. That's the default rubocop rule
as well. Personally I don't have a strong preference about this one.
[1] https://rubystyle.guide/#empty-lines-around-bodies
Having exceptions is better than having silent bugs.
There are a few methods I've kept the same way they were.
The `RelatedContentScore#score_with_opposite` method is a bit peculiar:
it creates scores for both itself and the opposite related content,
which means the opposite related content will try to create the same
scores as well.
We've already got a test to check `Budget::Ballot#add_investment` when
creating a line fails ("Edge case voting a non-elegible investment").
Finally, the method `User#send_oauth_confirmation_instructions` doesn't
update the record when the email address isn't already present, leading
to the test "Try to register with the email of an already existing user,
when an unconfirmed email was provided by oauth" fo fail if we raise an
exception for an invalid user. That's because updating a user's email
doesn't update the database automatically, but instead a confirmation
email is sent.
There are also a few false positives for classes which don't have bang
methods (like the GraphQL classes) or destroying attachments.
For these reasons, I'm adding the rule with a "Refactor" severity,
meaning it's a rule we can break if necessary.
Now factories define default headings for investments, so there's no
need to create a group and a heading to create an investment.
Likewise, in order to create a heading it isn't necessary to specify a
group anymore; specifying the budget is enough.
It's possible that there are more similar cases we haven't simplified
yet; I'm only addressing the obvious ones.
The `type: :feature` is automatically detected by RSpec because these
tests are inside the `spec/features` folder. Using `feature` re-adds a
`type: :feature` to these files, which will result in a conflict when we
upgrade to Rails 5.1's system tests.
Because of this change, we also need to change `background` to `before`
or else these tests will fail.
Eventhough some of us sentimentals still like the syntax `to_not` the current trend is to move to the new syntax `not_to`.
In this commit we are updating the references of expectations that used `to_not` to `not_to`.
Why:
Sometimes the latitude or longitude it passed to the map as *********
instead of the actual latitude or longitud. The asterisks are not a
string, breaking the whole array
https://github.com/consul/consul/issues/2380
What:
This commits skips invalid markers and displays the rest
How:
- Substituting the mysterious asterisks for null
(cleanInvestmentCoordinates)
- Validating the coordinates are numbers before trying to pain
them(validCoordinates)
- Adding a numeric function to validate the latitude and longitude
(isNumeric)
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9716468/is-there-any-function-like-i
snumeric-in-javascript-to-validate-numbers#answer-9716488
When there are no budgets we were seeing an exception in the budgets’
index
There are two parts to take into account here:
1) Making sure there is a current_budget present, otherwise we display
the “no budgets” message
2) The map helper is called from the controller, so we need to make
sure current_budget is present there too
Note: We could have added a bunch of `try` statements in the budgets’s
index, instead of using a conditional, however there are quite a few
`current_budget` calls so it seems more appropriate to use a conditional
Budget's home page has changed, no longer we'll be showing a list of
active budgets, but only one current (open) budget and a list of
finished ones.
So no need to create 3 budgets in a row, but a finished budget (because
we already have a valid budget created)
