This rule was added in rubocop 1.44.0. It's useful to avoid accidental
`unless !condition` clauses.
Note we aren't replacing `unless zero?` with `if nonzero?` because we
never use `nonzero?`; using it sounds like `if !zero?`.
Replacing `unless any?` with `if none?` is only consistent if we also replace
`unless present?` with `if blank?`, so we're also adding this case. For
consistency, we're also replacing `unless blank?` with `if present?`.
We're also simplifying code dealing with `> 0` conditions in order to
make the code (hopefully) easier to understand.
Also for consistency, we're enabling the `Style/InverseMethods` rule,
which follows a similar idea.
By using real XML responses developers will be able to understand better
how the integration works (the data flow), and the correspondency between
`remote_census` settings and their place at a real XML response.
As `stubbed_responses` methods were removed from the model layer now the
stubbing part should be managed from the test environment code so also
added a new helper module `RemoteCensusSetup` that can be used anywhere
where we need to call the web service.
Co-Authored-By: Javi Martín <javim@elretirao.net>
By simplyfing the responses the configuration for specs can be simpler too.
We're also using more generic terms instead of the ones used in Madrid's
Census API.
Co-Authored-By: Javi Martín <javim@elretirao.net>
We were inconsistent on this one. I consider it particularly useful when
a method starts with a `return` statement.
In other cases, we probably shouldn't have a guard rule in the middle of
a method in any case, but that's a different refactoring.
We were very inconsistent regarding these rules.
Personally I prefer no empty lines around blocks, clases, etc... as
recommended by the Ruby style guide [1], and they're the default values
in rubocop, so those are the settings I'm applying.
The exception is the `private` access modifier, since we were leaving
empty lines around it most of the time. That's the default rubocop rule
as well. Personally I don't have a strong preference about this one.
[1] https://rubystyle.guide/#empty-lines-around-bodies
New RemoteCensusAPI allow receive :date_of_birth and
:postal_code and use in request to endpoint always that have
been configured on remote_census_configuration:
- Setting["remote_census.request.date_of_birth"]
- Setting["remote_census.request.postal_code"]
Add new params to CensusCaller 'call' method.
Create a new RemoteCensusAPI with the same functionality as
the old CensusAPI.
In the new RemoteCensusAPI both the request and the
processing of the response are made according to the
parameters defined in the "Remote Census Configuration"
page.
Same as old Census API we only consider document_type and
document_number on API request.
* request(document_type, document_number))
On "Remote Census Configuration" we allow to define request
structure on Setting["remote_census.request.structure"]
The information text of this field on "Remote Census Configuration" is:
> The "static" values of this request should be filled.
> Values related to Document Type, Document Number, Date of Birth and
Postal Code should be nil value.
An Example with the expected value for this field:
"{ request:
{
codigo_institucion: 1,
codigo_portal: 1,
codigo_usuario: 1,
documento: nil,
tipo_documento: nil,
codigo_idioma: '102',
nivel: '3'
}
}"
Where 'codigo_institucion', 'codigo_portal', 'codigo_usuario' and
'nivel' are "static" and filled in with their expected static values.
On the other hand 'documento' and 'tipo_documento' are fields
related with 'document_type','document_number' and filled in with
nil value.
On 'request' method we fill in thats 'nil values' with their
correct argument value. We can fill_in correctly because on
"Remote Census Configuration" we allow to define request path for
'document_type','document_number'
Setting["remote_census.request.document_type"]
Setting["remote_census.request.document_number"]
An Example with the expected values:
Setting["remote_census.request.document_type"] = "request.tipo_documento"
Setting["remote_census.request.document_number"] = "request.documento"
With this information with 'fill_in(structure, path_value, value)'
method, we can update structure with correct argument ('document_type',
'document_number', 'date_of_birth' and 'postal_code') value.
An Example of fill_in(structure, path_value, value) where:
structure = "{ request:
{
codigo_institucion: 1,
codigo_portal: 1,
codigo_usuario: 1,
documento: nil,
tipo_documento: nil,
codigo_idioma: '102',
nivel: '3'
}
}"
path_value = "request.documento"
value = "12345678X"
The result expected is:
{ request:
{
codigo_institucion: 1,
codigo_portal: 1,
codigo_usuario: 1,
documento: "12345678X",
tipo_documento: nil,
codigo_idioma: '102',
nivel: '3'
}
}
