Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Javi Martín
7212657c02 Remove Paperclip and use just Active Storage 2022-02-23 18:43:48 +01:00
Javi Martín
e0e35298d5 Use Active Storage to handle cached attachments
This fixes a few issues we've had for years.

First, when attaching an image and then sending a form with validation
errors, the image preview would not be rendered when the form was
displayed once again. Now it's rendered as expected.

Second, when attaching an image, removing it, and attaching a new
one, browsers were displaying the image preview of the first one. That's
because Paperclip generated the same URL from both files (as they both
had the same hash data and prefix). Browsers usually cache images and
render the cached image when getting the same URL.

Since now we're storing each image in a different Blob, the images have
different URLs and so the preview of the second one is correctly
displayed.

Finally, when users downloaded a document, they were getting files with
a very long hexadecimal hash as filename. Now they get the original
filename.
2022-02-23 18:21:38 +01:00
Senén Rodero Rodríguez
5a4921a1af Use URI.open to assign external cached attachments
We were having issues with cached attachments and external services.

A `Tempfile` is returned by `URI.open` when using S3, so we're dealing
with this case as well.
2021-09-24 13:39:15 +02:00
Javi Martín
1290e2ecd3 Store files with both Paperclip and ActiveStorage
In order to migrate existing files from Paperclip to ActiveStorage, we
need Paperclip to find out the files associated to existing database
records. So we can't simply replace Paperclip with ActiveStorage.

That's why it's usually recommended [1] to first run the migration and
then replace Paperclip with ActiveStorage using two consecutive
deployments.

However, in our case we can't rely on two consecutive deployments
because we have to make an easy process so existing CONSUL installations
don't run into any issues. We can't just release version 1.4.0 and 1.5.0
and day and ask everyone to upgrade twice on the same day.

Instead, we're following a different plan:

* We're going to provide a Rake task (which will require Paperclip) to
  migrate existing files
* We still use Paperclip to generate link and image tags
* New files are handled using both Paperclip and ActiveStorage; that
  way, when we make the switch, we won't have to migrate them, and in
  the meantime they'll be accessible thanks to Paperclip
* After we make the switch, we'll update the `name` column in the active
  storage attachments tables in order to remove the `storage_` prefix

Regarding our handling of new files, the exception are cached
attachments. Since those attachments are temporary files used while
submitting a form and we have to delete them afterwards, we're only
handling them with Paperclip. We'll handle these ones in version 1.5.0.

Note the task creating the dev seeds was failing after these changes
with an `ActiveStorage::IntegrityError` exception because we were
opening some files without closing them. If the same file was attached
twice, it failed the second time.

We're solving it by closing the files with `File.open` and a block. Even
though we didn't get any errors, we're doing the same thing in the
`Attachable` concern because it's a good practice to close files after
we're done with them.

Also note we have to change the CKEditor Active Storage code so it's
compatible with Paperclip. In this case, I haven't been able to write a
test to confirm the attachment exists; I was getting the same
`ActiveStorage::IntegrityError` mentioned above.

Finally, we're updating the site customization image controller to use
`update` so the image and the attachment are updated within the same
transaction. This is also what we do in most controllers.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZ_WNUytO9o
2021-09-24 13:39:15 +02:00