We were repeating the same code over and over (with a few variants) to
setup tests which require an administrator. We can use a tag and
simplify the code.
In some tables, we had "actions", and some columns were also links
pointing to some places. Having both of them at the same time is
confusing, particularly since traditionally the links in the columns
pointed to the same place as some of the actions (although that's not
the case since commit 48db31cd).
We're still keeping links in tables which don't have an action column.
For instance, the proposals table has a "select" button which would be
harder to use if we had action buttons next to it.
This rule was added in rubocop-rspec 1.39.0. The `visible: false` option
is equivalent to `visible: :all`, but we generally use it meaning
`visible: :hidden` for positive expectations and `visible: :all` for
negative expectations.
The only exceptations are tests where we count the number of map icons
present. I'm assuming in this case we care about the number of map icons
independently on whether they are currently shown in the map, so I'm
keeping the `visible: :all` behavior in this case.
By default, Capybara only finds visible elements, so adding the
`visible: true` option is usually redundant.
We were using it sometimes to make it an obvious contrast with another
test using `visible: false`. However, from the user's perspective, we
don't care whether the element has been removed from the DOM or has been
hidden, so we can just test that the visible selector can't be found.
Besides, using `visible: false` means the test will also pass if the
element is present and visible. However, we want the test to fail if the
element is visible. That's why a couple of JavaScript-dependant tests
were passing even when JavaScript was disabled.
This rule was added in Rubocop 0.91.0. A similar rule named
LeakyConstantDeclaration was added in rubocop-rspec 1.34.0.
Note using the FILENAMES constant did not result in an offense using the
ConstantDefinitionInBlock rule but did result in an offense using the
LeakyConstantDeclaration rule. I've simplified the code to get rid of
the constant; not sure why we were adding a constant with `||=` in the
middle of a spec.
When a user recovers a page from browser history where placed a
marker in different map pane (visible map layer) marker was
successfully added to the map but the map center is the one
defined at Settings map properties so the marker was not visible
to the user.
Now when map_location form has valid coordinates we use them
instead of default map center settings. This will avoid the user to
have to rellocate the marker (or find the correct pane where the
marker was added) if already placed.
When using an editable map is better to load marker latitude, longitude and
map zoom from form fields so we can show the marker at latest position defined
by user when the page was restored from browser history.
To reproduce this behavior:
0. Undo this commit
1. Go to new proposal page
2. Place the proposal map marker
3. Go away to any other page
4. Restore new proposal page from browser history.
At this point you should not see the recently placed marker.
The same thing happens when editing a proposal.
If we do not do this a map could be initialized twice times or more
when restoring a page with a map causing weird UI effects and
loading some map layers also twice times or more.
Need to add a maps array to be able to store all initialized
(visible) maps so we can destroy them when needed. Notice that
we are destroying maps also when admin settings tabs changes
(only visible ones), this is again to avoid to re-initialize map more
than once when users navigate through settings tabs, another
option to the settings issue could be to detect if the map was
already initialized to skip uneeded initialization.
We were submitting the form without checking the AJAX request to attach
the image had finished, so sometimes two requests were executed at the
same time. Sometimes this made InvisibleCaptcha to go crazy and report
the form was submitted too quickly.
Checking the first AJAX request has finished before submitting the form
solves the problem.
We were checking `expect_document_has_title(0, "My Title")`, which was
already true before the AJAX request generated by `attach_file` had
finished.
That meant the AJAX request sometimes was handled after this test had
finished, affecting the following test and causing it to fail because
its cookie was overwritten and so `current_user` was set to `nil`.
In the test checking the filename is present, a similar scenario was
taking place: we were updating the `.file-name` element in the `change`
event of `fileupload` (using `App.Documentable.setFilename`); that is,
when the AJAX request started. And so the test passed before the request
was finished, causing the same issue.
