We were jumping from h1 to h3 and some of these sections (cards and
processes) had h3 tags inside them.
My best guess is we were using h3 so the titles were smaller. So I'm
adding a CSS mixin to easily use a font size of a different heading tag.
We were having some style issues when adding the processes feed to the
goal view because of this lack of separation.
We're using a <section> tag so it's clear where the <header> tag belongs
to.
They were all following the same format.
Note we need to group the `see_all` translation keys together (the same
way it's done with the `most_active` keys) so we don't have an unused
translation warning.
We're also moving the "see all" link in processes outside the feed
content; the same way it's done in debates and proposals and removing
unnecessary classes in the processes feed: the column class is causing
the processes not to be aligned with the debates above them, and the
margin bottom is not needed because the margin of the footer is already
enough.
Note we're using the code instead of the ID to get the goal in the URL.
IMHO this is what most people would expect; visiting a URL with a "7"
takes you to SDG number 7, and not to the one with "7" as a database ID.
In order to avoid tests (either automated tests or manual tests) passing
by coincidence due to the goal ID and the goal code being the same, I'm
shuffling the codes before entering them in the databse.
I've tried using `resolve` in the routes so the code is automatically
taken into account, but it doesn't work since `resolve` cannot be used
inside a namespace, and here we're within the `sdg` namespace.
Note using `params[:relatable_type].classify` is recognized as a
security risk by some tools. However, it's a false positive, since we've
added constraints to the URL so that paramenter can only have the values
we trust.
* Add a header element as component markup wrapper
* Allow component to receive an optional block
* Add reusable styles for header links
Co-autored-by: Javi Martín <javim@elretirao.net>
We were writing the same text over and over for the same translations.
Since they all serve the same function, it's perfectly fine for them to
have the same text, and so we can have a shared translation.
This way we simplify the HTML and generating similar menus will be
easier. We also improve the experience for screen reader users, who
might have been hearing the icons as text because we weren't using the
`aria-hidden` attribute.
We're still keeping the "icon-" classes for compatibility with CONSUL
installations which might have changed this code.
From a semantic point of view, there's no reason to add a strong
emphasis to the menu items.
Besides, using CSS simplifies the code and is less error-prone. For
instance, the "stats" section didn't have a <strong> tag, and so it was
the only one which wasn't bold.
