We were treating legislation proposals as if they were proposals,
omitting the "legislation" namespace, and so we were flagging/unflagging
proposals when we wanted to flag/unflag a legislation proposal.
The `respond_with` method is no longer part of Rails (it's now part of
the responders gem) and we barely use it. Using a template forced us to
use different criteria for different controllers.
This change will also make it easier to fix the flag/unflag actions for
legislation proposals. With the old code, we would have to add another
condition for the legislation/proposals controller.
We were very inconsistent regarding these rules.
Personally I prefer no empty lines around blocks, clases, etc... as
recommended by the Ruby style guide [1], and they're the default values
in rubocop, so those are the settings I'm applying.
The exception is the `private` access modifier, since we were leaving
empty lines around it most of the time. That's the default rubocop rule
as well. Personally I don't have a strong preference about this one.
[1] https://rubystyle.guide/#empty-lines-around-bodies
