We were getting a validation error when skipping user verification and
creating proposals
This was due to the responsible_name being empty for unverified users
As skipping user verification is a temporary setting used until Census
integration is configured, we can safely skip this validation when this
setting is active
Banners were not been shown in certain pages; now
they are.
Spec to check if the banner is been shown correctly
added. Before it was in admins specs, now it has it's
own spec out of admins folder.
Banner sections can be saved (one banner can appear in several sections)
If the hex color is changed in the textfield, the color of the color picker changes.
We were seeing an exceptions in the home page when displaying
recommendations. This was due to trying to load tags of hidden proposals
With this commit we are skipping proposals that that have been hidden,
which will hopefully solve this exception
These tests were failing randomly because there is no guarantee
the methods `Budget#email_selected` and `Budget#email_unselected` will
always send the emails in the same order, because `investments.selected`
and `investments.unselected` don't necessarily return the records in the
order they were created.
Ordering by id is certainly not very elegant; however, ordering by
another field like `created_at` is dangerous because the record could be
created at (almost) the exact same time.
Related to issue #2446 and issue #2519.
The restore feature was not working properly. When pushed, the button
was removing the notification from the admins panel, but it was not
restoring in the proposal.
I added an `after_restore` function (that I missed in the first PR)
so that the notification is unmarked as moderated.
Add new routes for the proposal notifications edition and
abilities to let moderators edit it (mark as ignored, hide, etc.).
The notifications are not flaggable because they doesn't work like that,
but in a similar way. The moderator/administrator is in charge of hidding
them through the UI, so the normal users don't flag it as inappropriate.
New controller Moderation::ProposalNotification to manage the moderators
work.
Note there is some funkiness going on with class loadings
Had to create a `feed` and `widget_feed` table even though in this
first version the Widget::Feed includes only uses ActiveModel instead
of ActiveRecord, otherwise some specs failed
We’ll figure it out and clean up 😌
changed functions on verification.rb, the first thing they do is
return true whene skip_user_verification is active.
changed show_welcome_screen? on user.rb, now its shows the welcome
page even with te option active.
changed welcome.html.erb, now if the user see this view and the
option is activated, all 4 checks are green, not only 2.
There was a problem with the portuguese locale.
The locale was pt-BR, but `globalize_accessors` gem
doesn't allow the creation of methods using locales
with that format.
To avoid transforming pt-BR to pt and lose the distinction
of the different variations of the language, a function has
been added to transform pt-BR into pt_br (without changing
the locale itself). That way, when globalize uses the locales,
all of them will have a valid format (downcased and underscored)
AND they will be always the same (comparing pt-BR with pt_br
doesn't work).
Until we correctly make MapLocation relation with mappables a polymorphic
one... we'll need to return the investment_id and proposal_id values.
Right now it was returning the MapLocation ID, and the JS was making a
call searching for an Investment with the MapLocation ID... sometimes
finding a record with same ID but totally NOT the one associated to the
MapLocation.
The csv generation doesn't seem like a Model concern, at least not taking
into account the amount of lines of the method (36+). Just a simple ruby
class that encapsulates the logic makes it easier to read and maintain as
we increase the columns exported.. also customize in case other forks need
different values.
There's no good reason to call assigned_valuators(investment) when the
logic can be at the model.
Also removed the valuator_groups texts to be added in an independent
method
Why:
ValuatorGroup name should be unique and present to be able to identify
correctly each of them.
How:
- Adding a presence & uniqueness validation at the model
- Adding a sequenced value for name attribute at its factory
- Adding missing model spec that covers validations
Date.new(...) does not take into account the current timezone, while other
parts of the application do. By default always parsing any date with the
default timezone and converting the resulting Time to Date would prevent
this kind of issues
DateTime.parse(...).in_time_zone gives an unexpected result, as the
DateTime.parse(...) will create a DateTime with +0000 time zone and the
`in_time_zone` will modify the DateTime to adjust to the default zone.
Maybe its better explained with an example, using 'Lima' as timezone:
DateTime.parse("2015-01-01")
> Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000
DateTime.parse("2015-01-01").in_time_zone
> Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:00:00 -05 -05:00
And that's not the desired date but the previous day!
