When there are no budgets we were seeing an exception in the budgets’
index
There are two parts to take into account here:
1) Making sure there is a current_budget present, otherwise we display
the “no budgets” message
2) The map helper is called from the controller, so we need to make
sure current_budget is present there too
Note: We could have added a bunch of `try` statements in the budgets’s
index, instead of using a conditional, however there are quite a few
`current_budget` calls so it seems more appropriate to use a conditional
Date.new(...) does not take into account the current timezone, while other
parts of the application do. By default always parsing any date with the
default timezone and converting the resulting Time to Date would prevent
this kind of issues
DateTime.parse(...).in_time_zone gives an unexpected result, as the
DateTime.parse(...) will create a DateTime with +0000 time zone and the
`in_time_zone` will modify the DateTime to adjust to the default zone.
Maybe its better explained with an example, using 'Lima' as timezone:
DateTime.parse("2015-01-01")
> Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000
DateTime.parse("2015-01-01").in_time_zone
> Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:00:00 -05 -05:00
And that's not the desired date but the previous day!
Not sure how this error creeped in 😕 probably a new gem version or
other conflicting code
The problem was we were getting an `unpermitted param email` when
updating a user’s email address
This stackoverflow solution seems to work nicely 😌https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17384289/unpermitted-parameters-addi
ng-new-fields-to-devise-in-rails-4-0#answer-19036427
During the backport for “Read Notifications”[1] this link was added,
which belongs to a different backport “Budget Recommendations” which is
not quite ready to bring to upstream, yet 😌
[1] https://github.com/AyuntamientoMadrid/consul/pull/1304
The user was able to vote as many investments as wanted in the first
heading voted. However in the second heading voted, only one investment
could be voted
This was due to the previous implementation, where you could only vote
in one heading. Note the `first` call in method
`heading_voted_by_user?(user)`
This commits simplifies the logic and allows voting for any investment
in any heading that the user has previously voted in
This method was used only in Madrid’s fork, but it is now needed to
complete the backport for voting in multiple headings
There wasn’t a test in Madrid, so here goes one too. Even though, the
responsibility should probably be moved soon to the `Budget::Heading`.
For consistency with the related methods and tests it has been left in
the investment_spec
Now that we have the option of voting in multiple headings per group,
the method of voting in a “different heading assigned” has become
deprecated and thus removed
Changing a group’s `to_param` to return the slug instead of the id,
breaks many tests in the user facing interface
We should use slugs in upstream soon, but it should be done in a
separate PR, bringing the whole slug implementation from Madrid’s fork
and the corresponding test coverage
To maintain order after editing a heading’s name
We should probably add timestamps to `groups` and `headings` and order
by `created_at` instead
Could have done it in a separate PR, but gotta keep moving to other
priority issues. Creating issue for timestamps to do correctly and with
tests 😌
We were having a problem were some groups where not updating correctly.
That was because it was finding the first group with that name. However
we were looking for another group with the same name from another budget
Apart from the group_id, we also get the budget_id in the params for
updating a group. By finding groups within that budget we get the
expected behaviour
When a valuator tries to edit/valuate an investment outside valuating
phase, an explanatory message will be shown along with a redirect to
prevent access.
