Use a more precise required/optional fields legend
Usability tests showed some users were struggling when seeing the word "Required" as a legend (it's actually styled as a title), since this isn't a common pattern when filling in forms. They were expecting something like "Fields with * are required", and so the "Required" text alone made them feel the sentence wasn't complete. We could also add an "*" to required fields in addition to the "Required" text. In this case, however, some users wondered what the asterisk was about: "It can't mean 'required' because they've already said these fields are required". We'll probably have to revisit required and optional fields again. For now, we're just doing a small improvement.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -769,8 +769,8 @@ en:
|
|||||||
zero: "0 languages in use"
|
zero: "0 languages in use"
|
||||||
one: "1 language in use"
|
one: "1 language in use"
|
||||||
other: "%{count} languages in use"
|
other: "%{count} languages in use"
|
||||||
optional: "Optional"
|
optional: "Optional fields"
|
||||||
required: "Required"
|
required: "Required fields"
|
||||||
social:
|
social:
|
||||||
facebook: "%{org} Facebook"
|
facebook: "%{org} Facebook"
|
||||||
twitter: "%{org} Twitter"
|
twitter: "%{org} Twitter"
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -769,8 +769,8 @@ es:
|
|||||||
zero: "0 idiomas en uso"
|
zero: "0 idiomas en uso"
|
||||||
one: "1 idioma en uso"
|
one: "1 idioma en uso"
|
||||||
other: "%{count} idiomas en uso"
|
other: "%{count} idiomas en uso"
|
||||||
optional: "Opcional"
|
optional: "Campos opcionales"
|
||||||
required: "Obligatorio"
|
required: "Campos obligatorios"
|
||||||
social:
|
social:
|
||||||
facebook: "Facebook de %{org}"
|
facebook: "Facebook de %{org}"
|
||||||
twitter: "Twitter de %{org}"
|
twitter: "Twitter de %{org}"
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user