Simplify tests validating postal codes

We weren't using the `be_valid` matcher because we had errors in the
census data.

Removing the `before_validation` callback and using a method to get the
census data instead allows us to stub the `census_data` method in the
tests, and so we can use the `be_valid` matcher instead of calling
`valid?` manually and then checking for errors.
This commit is contained in:
Javi Martín
2021-11-13 18:09:00 +01:00
parent f4512b2117
commit 006269a94b
2 changed files with 23 additions and 30 deletions

View File

@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ class Verification::Residence
attr_accessor :user, :document_number, :document_type, :date_of_birth, :postal_code, :terms_of_service
before_validation :retrieve_census_data
validates :document_number, presence: true
validates :document_type, presence: true
validates :date_of_birth, presence: true
@@ -69,11 +67,11 @@ class Verification::Residence
end
def district_code
@census_data.district_code
census_data.district_code
end
def gender
@census_data.gender
census_data.gender
end
def local_postal_code
@@ -92,14 +90,14 @@ class Verification::Residence
private
def retrieve_census_data
@census_data = CensusCaller.new.call(document_type, document_number, date_of_birth, postal_code)
def census_data
@census_data ||= CensusCaller.new.call(document_type, document_number, date_of_birth, postal_code)
end
def residency_valid?
@census_data.valid? &&
@census_data.postal_code == postal_code &&
@census_data.date_of_birth == date_of_birth
census_data.valid? &&
census_data.postal_code == postal_code &&
census_data.date_of_birth == date_of_birth
end
def clean_document_number

View File

@@ -48,44 +48,39 @@ describe Verification::Residence do
end
describe "postal code" do
before { Setting["postal_codes"] = "28001-28100,28200" }
before do
Setting["postal_codes"] = "28001-28100,28200"
census_data = double(valid?: true, district_code: "", gender: "")
allow(census_data).to receive(:postal_code) { residence.postal_code }
allow(census_data).to receive(:date_of_birth) { residence.date_of_birth }
allow(residence).to receive(:census_data).and_return(census_data)
end
it "is valid with postal codes included in settings" do
residence.postal_code = "28012"
residence.valid?
expect(residence.errors[:postal_code]).to be_empty
expect(residence).to be_valid
residence.postal_code = "28001"
residence.valid?
expect(residence.errors[:postal_code]).to be_empty
expect(residence).to be_valid
residence.postal_code = "28100"
residence.valid?
expect(residence.errors[:postal_code]).to be_empty
expect(residence).to be_valid
residence.postal_code = "28200"
residence.valid?
expect(residence.errors[:postal_code]).to be_empty
expect(residence).to be_valid
end
it "is not valid with postal codes not included in settings" do
residence.postal_code = "12345"
residence.valid?
expect(residence.errors[:postal_code].size).to eq(1)
expect(residence).not_to be_valid
residence.postal_code = "28000"
residence.valid?
expect(residence.errors[:postal_code].size).to eq(1)
expect(residence).not_to be_valid
residence.postal_code = "28101"
residence.valid?
expect(residence).not_to be_valid
expect(residence.errors.count).to eq 1
expect(residence.errors[:postal_code]).to eq ["In order to be verified, you must be registered."]
end
end