JavaScript is used by about 98% of web users, so by testing without it enabled, we're only testing that the application works for a very reduced number of users. We proceeded this way in the past because CONSUL started using Rails 4.2 and truncating the database between JavaScript tests with database cleaner, which made these tests terribly slow. When we upgraded to Rails 5.1 and introduced system tests, we started using database transactions in JavaScript tests, making these tests much faster. So now we can use JavaScript tests everywhere without critically slowing down our test suite.
48 lines
1.3 KiB
Ruby
48 lines
1.3 KiB
Ruby
require "rails_helper"
|
|
|
|
describe "Localization" do
|
|
before do
|
|
login_as_manager
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "Wrong locale" do
|
|
visit management_root_path(locale: :es)
|
|
visit management_root_path(locale: :klingon)
|
|
|
|
expect(page).to have_text("Gestión")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "Available locales appear in the locale switcher" do
|
|
visit management_root_path
|
|
|
|
within(".locale-form .js-location-changer") do
|
|
expect(page).to have_content "Español"
|
|
expect(page).to have_content "English"
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "The current locale is selected" do
|
|
visit management_root_path
|
|
expect(page).to have_select("locale-switcher", selected: "English")
|
|
expect(page).to have_text("Management")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "Changing the locale" do
|
|
visit management_root_path
|
|
expect(page).to have_content("Language")
|
|
|
|
select("Español", from: "locale-switcher")
|
|
expect(page).to have_content("Idioma")
|
|
expect(page).not_to have_content("Language")
|
|
expect(page).to have_select("locale-switcher", selected: "Español")
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "Locale switcher not present if only one locale" do
|
|
allow(I18n).to receive(:available_locales).and_return([:en])
|
|
|
|
visit management_root_path
|
|
expect(page).not_to have_content("Language")
|
|
expect(page).not_to have_css("div.locale")
|
|
end
|
|
end
|