For the HashAlignment rule, we're using the default `key` style (keys are aligned and values aren't) instead of the `table` style (both keys and values are aligned) because, even if we used both in the application, we used the `key` style a lot more. Furthermore, the `table` style looks strange in places where there are both very long and very short keys and sometimes we weren't even consistent with the `table` style, aligning some keys without aligning other keys. Ideally we could align hashes to "either key or table", so developers can decide whether keeping the symmetry of the code is worth it in a case-per-case basis, but Rubocop doesn't allow this option.
76 lines
2.8 KiB
Ruby
76 lines
2.8 KiB
Ruby
require "rails_helper"
|
|
|
|
describe "Machine learning" do
|
|
let(:user_tag) { create(:tag, name: "user tag") }
|
|
let(:ml_proposal_tag) { create(:tag, name: "machine learning proposal tag") }
|
|
let(:ml_investment_tag) { create(:tag, name: "machine learning investment tag") }
|
|
let(:proposal) { create(:proposal) }
|
|
let(:related_proposal) { create(:proposal) }
|
|
let(:investment) { create(:budget_investment) }
|
|
let(:related_investment) { create(:budget_investment) }
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
Setting["feature.machine_learning"] = true
|
|
Setting["machine_learning.comments_summary"] = true
|
|
Setting["machine_learning.related_content"] = true
|
|
Setting["machine_learning.tags"] = true
|
|
|
|
proposal.update!(tag_list: [user_tag])
|
|
proposal.update!(ml_tag_list: [ml_proposal_tag])
|
|
investment.update!(tag_list: [user_tag])
|
|
investment.update!(ml_tag_list: [ml_investment_tag])
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "proposal view" do
|
|
create(:ml_summary_comment, commentable: proposal, body: "Life is wonderful")
|
|
create(:related_content, parent_relationable: proposal,
|
|
child_relationable: related_proposal,
|
|
machine_learning: true)
|
|
|
|
visit proposal_path(proposal)
|
|
|
|
within "#tags_proposal_#{proposal.id}" do
|
|
expect(page).not_to have_link "user tag"
|
|
expect(page).to have_link "machine learning proposal tag"
|
|
expect(page).not_to have_link "machine learning investment tag"
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
within ".related-content" do
|
|
expect(page).to have_content "Related content (1)"
|
|
expect(page).to have_css ".related-content-title"
|
|
expect(page).to have_content related_proposal.title
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
within "#comments" do
|
|
expect(page).to have_content "Comments summary"
|
|
expect(page).to have_content "Life is wonderful"
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
scenario "investment view" do
|
|
create(:ml_summary_comment, commentable: investment, body: "Build in the main square")
|
|
create(:related_content, parent_relationable: investment,
|
|
child_relationable: related_investment,
|
|
machine_learning: true)
|
|
|
|
visit budget_investment_path(investment.budget, investment)
|
|
|
|
within "#tags_budget_investment_#{investment.id}" do
|
|
expect(page).not_to have_link "user tag"
|
|
expect(page).not_to have_link "machine learning proposal tag"
|
|
expect(page).to have_link "machine learning investment tag"
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
within ".related-content" do
|
|
expect(page).to have_content "Related content (1)"
|
|
expect(page).to have_css ".related-content-title", count: 1
|
|
expect(page).to have_content related_investment.title
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
within "#tab-comments" do
|
|
expect(page).to have_content "Comments summary"
|
|
expect(page).to have_content "Build in the main square"
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|