Settings are stored in the database, and so any changes to the settings
done during the tests are automatically rolled back between one test and
the next one.
There were also a few places where we weren't using an `after` block but
changing the setting at the end of the test.
While the test should work without this assertion, the intention of the
test is to check what happens if a user selects and investment and, once
it's selected, clicks the "next" link.
When we were inserting a row or replacing an existing one (just like we
do when we click the link to select an investment), we were entering a
row containing all columns, and all of them were displayed even if they
had been excluded using the column selector.
This caused the table to move in a strange way, which sometimes made the
investment selection tests fail.
* Adapt translatable spec helper method to work with budget investments
* Remove old attributes from strong parameters
* Add missing locales to admin.yml and budgets.yml
* Change SpendingProposal.title_max_length and
SpendingProposal.description_max_lenght to Budget::Investment methods
* Add budget investment translatable attribute translations
After adding investment translatable fields to forms, they will be
generated with nested translations names and ids so we can no longer
use standard id locator.
Using input label text to fill in fields works with both types of forms.
Results were not including records without translations for current
locale (I18n.locale). Now we search for given title against all
translation fallbacks for current locale.
The `type: :feature` is automatically detected by RSpec because these
tests are inside the `spec/features` folder. Using `feature` re-adds a
`type: :feature` to these files, which will result in a conflict when we
upgrade to Rails 5.1's system tests.
Because of this change, we also need to change `background` to `before`
or else these tests will fail.
When params[:budget_investment][:valuation_tag_list] was not present,
which is the case when updating an investment using the "mark as visible
to valuators" checkbox, we were removing all valuation tags.
Using a virtual attribute to assign the tags only if the parameter is
present simplifies the code in the controller and avoids the issue.
So under the tab "without valuator" we don't show investments assigned
to a valuator group, just as expected by administrators.
There was a conflict while applying this commit to the CONSUL repo. I've
decided to re-introduce the test which was deleted in commit dddf026a,
which hadn't been deleted in AyuntamientoMadrid@192f1182.
After changing the order for budget investments, the selected investment
didn't appear on the first page anymore, and so it couldn't be clicked
on during the test.
As mentioned in the comments in PR #1256:
"These failures take place because the checkbox is already present
before clicking in 'under valuation', and so Capybara doesn't have to
wait for the 'under valuation' request to finish before clicking the
checkbox."
So sometimes Capybara tries to check/uncheck the checkbox at the same
time that checkbox is being replaced by the new content, resulting in no
request being sent to the server.
Making Capybara check the page to ensure the new content is already
loaded before checking/unchecking the checkbox solves the problem.
Changes introduced in commits 41f66fa and dc87b75 will render the
'See results' button under `admin/budget_investments` only if a
finished budget has winner investments associated with it
