We were treating legislation proposals as if they were proposals,
omitting the "legislation" namespace, and so we were flagging/unflagging
proposals when we wanted to flag/unflag a legislation proposal.
The `respond_with` method is no longer part of Rails (it's now part of
the responders gem) and we barely use it. Using a template forced us to
use different criteria for different controllers.
This change will also make it easier to fix the flag/unflag actions for
legislation proposals. With the old code, we would have to add another
condition for the legislation/proposals controller.
This filter was added in commit 4285ba4b, it was changed in commit
002d8688, and most of the code from the original commit has disappeared
without a trace (maybe due to a merge conflict?).
This filter could actually be useful if we started using it when users
click on a tag. Since we don't, I'm removing it. We might add it back if
we decide to actually use it.
Legislation::Proposal is not Globalize model but use CommentableActions and try
detect remote translations. Add new condition to discard Non Globalize models.
This fix is necessary since the following commit was included: c1f3a4ad.
Creating more than 25 records isn't necessary to test pagination; we can
stub the number of records per page in a test.
On my machine we save about one second per test with these changes.
The new CSV report was more configurable and could work on proposals,
processes and comments. However, it had several issues.
In the public area, by default it generated a blank file.
In the admin section, the report was hard to configure and it generated
a file with less quality than the old system.
So until we improve this system, we're bringing back the old investment
CSV exporter.
This commit reverts most of commit 9d1ca3bf.
We were inconsistent on this one. I consider it particularly useful when
a method starts with a `return` statement.
In other cases, we probably shouldn't have a guard rule in the middle of
a method in any case, but that's a different refactoring.
We were very inconsistent regarding these rules.
Personally I prefer no empty lines around blocks, clases, etc... as
recommended by the Ruby style guide [1], and they're the default values
in rubocop, so those are the settings I'm applying.
The exception is the `private` access modifier, since we were leaving
empty lines around it most of the time. That's the default rubocop rule
as well. Personally I don't have a strong preference about this one.
[1] https://rubystyle.guide/#empty-lines-around-bodies
In general, we always use relative URLs (using `_path`), but sometimes
we were accidentally using absolute URLs (using `_url`). It's been
reported i might cause some isuses if accepting both HTTP and HTTPS
connections, although we've never seen the case.
In any case, this change makes the code more consistent and makes the
generated HTML cleaner.
Moderate legislation proposals
- added a controller for moderation/legislation
- updated view to appropriate link + added route
- added a spec
- Feature test
- test for faded
- javascripts for visual effects
The code `where(id: ids)` is equivalent to `where(id: ids.uniq)`.
Since Rails 5 uses `distinct` instead of `uniq` and in most cases where
we use `uniq` with `pluck` we should simply remove the `uniq` call (as
done in this commit), we're also removing the `Rails/UniqBeforePluck`
rubocop rule.
The statement executed the method twice if the `present?` condition was
true. If the condition was false, it executed it once anyway.
It's probably a typo and originally we probably meant we wanted to
execute the method if the method existed.
- Create concern to reuse the logic of detection of non-existent
translations in Controllers.
- Add detect_remote_translation method:
* This method will be called from controllers to recover resources
without translation.
* Receive arrays of resources.
* Return an array with hashes of remote_translations values for
every resources that have not translations.
* This array will be the param that will be sent from view to
RemoteTranslationController for create remote translations instances.
We were raising a `CanCan::AcessDenied` and were getting a 500 Internal
Server Error.
I've chosen to do the same thing we do in the ApplicationController.
There are other options to handle this request, like redirecting to the
login page or returning a 401 Unauthorized HTTP status.
grouping_key_for method when params[:group] == "week" always returned "#{date.cweek}/#{date.year}" but that not always is true.
When a date belongs to the first_week/last_week of the year we have exceptions for example "31/12/2018". His cweek is equal to "1", old code returned "1/2018" value but correct result would be "1/2019".
This change forces us to use nested attributes for translations, instead
of using the more convenient `:"title_#{locale}"` methods.
On the other hand, we can use Rails' native `_destroy` attribute to
remove existing translations, so we don't have to use our custom
`delete_translations`, which was a bit buggy since it didn't consider
failed updates.
We were expecting translation parameters in legislation processes
`update` action. However, those parameters aren't sent when we get to
that action through the "proposals" tab.
