Our original interface to vote in a poll had a few issues:
* Since there was no button to send the form, it wasn't clear that
selecting an option would automatically store it in the database.
* The interface was almost identical for single-choice questions and
multiple-choice questions, which made it hard to know which type of
question we were answering.
* Adding other type of questions, like open answers, was hard since we
would have to add a different submit button for each answer.
So we're now using radio buttons for single-choice questions and
checkboxes for multiple-choice questions, which are the native controls
designed for these purposes, and a button to send the whole form.
Since we don't have a database table for poll ballots like we have for
budget ballots, we're adding a new `Poll::WebVote` model to manage poll
ballots. We're using WebVote instead of Ballot or Vote because they
could be mistaken with other vote classes.
Note that browsers don't allow removing answers with radio buttons, so
once somebody has voted in a single-choice question, they can't remove
the vote unless they manually edit their HTML. This is the same behavior
we had before commit 7df0e9a96.
As mentioned in c2010f975, we're now adding the `ChangeByZero` rubocop
rule, since we've removed the test that used `and change`.
Bumps [rubocop](https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop) from 1.71.2 to 1.75.8.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop/compare/v1.71.2...v1.75.8)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: rubocop
dependency-version: 1.75.8
dependency-type: direct:development
update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...
Notes:
This commit also includes several style and lint fixes required after
updating RuboCop:
- Removed redundant parentheses now detected by improved
'Style/RedundantParentheses' (1.72 and 1.75.3).
- Replaced ternary expressions with logical OR when the ternary was
returning 'true', as flagged by 'Style/RedundantCondition' (1.73).
- Adjusted block variables to resolve new 'Lint/ShadowingOuterLocalVariable'
offenses (1.75), helping avoid future conflicts during upgrades with
'rails app:updates'
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Since commit 23682fadd8, we have had the comment:
> # Review
> # Doble check why the file is stored with a name different to empty.pdf
This might be outdated.
These expectations are already covered by attach_new_file, so they are no longer needed:
> expect(page).to have_css ".loading-bar.complete"
We can remove the tests:
> "Should update loading bar style after invalid file upload"
because the expectation:
> expect(page).to have_css ".loading-bar.errors"
It is already tested in "Should not update document cached_attachment field after invalid file upload"
Note that this commit also applies a similar change to the
imageable_attach_new_file method by removing an unnecessary variable.
In order to testing with more than 1 max documents allowed we
keep one test with this value.
Removed the now-unused 'documentable_fill_new_valid_proposal' method
from common actions.
Note that it does not seem necessary to create an administrator with the user, as was
done in the original shared example. Also, as in the previous commit, it appears that
we do not need to set the user as the author when creating the documentable.
Also removed the documentable_redirected_to_resource_show_or_navigate_to method,
which was only used for the :proposal factory but was not necessary.
- In the "Proposal new" case (this commit), after submitting the form we are
redirected to the "created" page, where the link "Not now, go to my proposal"
does not appear. This caused the method to always raise a
Capybara::ElementNotFound and return nil.
Instead, this "created" page already displays a preview of the proposal
and a link to publish it. Since we can verify that the proposal was created
successfully here, no redirection or click is needed.
- In the "Proposal edit" case (next commit), the user is redirected directly
to the proposal's "show" page after update, so again, the method is
unnecessary and has been removed.
Replaced 'login_as' with 'do_login_for' using 'management: management_section?' to
handle login requirements correctly for each context.
Also removed the now-unused 'documentable_fill_new_valid_budget_investment' helper
from common actions.
Note that it does not seem necessary to create an administrator with the user, as was
done in the original shared example. Also, as in the previous commit, it appears that
we do not need to set the user as the author when creating the documentable.
While reviewing this, we also noticed that the create(:administrator, user: user) call
was unnecessarily included in the nested_imageable system spec in commit cdfaec5217 when
the path is a management section. So we use this commit to remove the unnecessary condition.
Make 'path', 'submit_button_text' and 'notice_text' dynamic based on
the factory.
Also adjusted the user. Budget investments require a level 2 user but do not need to be
an administrator.
Copied and renamed the 'documentable_fill_new_valid_budget_investment' method from
common actions, and introduced a 'fill_in_required_fields' method to manage multiple factories.
Added the two tests that were conditionally skipped in the shared example using
'unless: documentable_factory_name == "dashboard_action"', but omitted the call to
'documentable_redirected_to_resource_show_or_navigate_to', since it only applies to
proposals.
Note that when we create the documentable seems do not need use the user as author.
Removed 'documentable_path_arguments' and 'management'
parameters because they are not used by dashboard_action.
Also moved and renamed the 'documentable_fill_new_valid_dashboard_action' method
from the common actions helper to this file, since it is now only used here.
Hardcoded 'path', 'submit_button_text', and 'notice_text' for dashboard_action.
These remain fixed for now until dynamic values are required in future commits.
We were using an <a> tag wrapping the whole content of the banner in
order to make the whole banner clickable. However, that made the text of
the link less concise, affecting people using screen readers. So,
instead, we're using the `card` mixin, which we introduced in commit
f285dfcba.
We're making this change now because the HTML5 Sanitizer that we're
about to enable in the next commit was handling the whitespace inside
the banner differently, causing one test to fail, and we didn't find a
different way to fix it.
We were using a rack browser and testing the
`FeatureFlags::FeatureDisabled` exception was raised. However, we don't
test this exception in any other system tests; we only check it in
controller tests.
So we're using a real browser for consistency and because in Rails 7.1
this test is failing when enabling the new default option
`config.action_dispatch.show_exceptions = :rescuable` in the test
environment.
We were using a placeholder, which is way less accessible than a label.
One issue here (which also happened before, but is now more obvious) is
that, when adding several options, there will be many fields with the
same label.
Another issue is that, for some languages, we're using texts like "Add a
closed answer", which might be confusing because we might be editing an
existing answer. The proper solution would probably be using the text
"Option 1", "Option 2", ... I'm not doing so right now because I'm not
sure that's a good option and because changing the text would mean
losing the existing translations.
Back when we added all the missing labels (changes that we merged in
commit c34cab282), we forgot about fields which had placeholdes, since
Axe doesn't report an error when there are placeholders but there aren't
labels.
In this case, we were using an invalid <label> tag for the question
options, and <h3> tags as labels for the votes.
Using standard labels solves the issue.
