Doing so will help to immediately identify which administration you're
managing when using multitenant applications.
We might revert this change if we detect it causes usability issues in
the admin section.
Should hollow buttons use the same color as links do or the same color
as solid buttons do? In the default scenario, it doesn't matter, since
links and solid buttons use the same color. However, it matters when
people customize the application so links and solid buttons don't use
the same color.
I'm choosing to use the same color for solid and hollow buttons because
these elements are usually isolated and so from the UX perspective they
are similar; links, on the other hand, are often in the middle of some
text.
Note we're talking about links and buttons while many of the "buttons"
we use in the application are actually links styled as buttons. Here,
"buttons" means "things that look like buttons".
We were overwriting the color of the links, but not the color of the
links on hover.
Note we're removing the `!important` rule from the author link; after
testing it, it looks like it wasn't necessary.
We were using the wrong color since commit e2d540d20 because, by using
`@extend`, the compiled CSS had the styles for `.ui-state-hover` appear
before the styles for `.ui-state-default`.
They were added in Rubocop 1.24.0.
Even if we were already applying FileRead everywhere, this is something
we've manually fixed in the past. Another reason to add it is that these
rules are deeply related.
The scripts crashed when the `data` folder wasn't present, which is the
common situation in development environments or production environments
not using Capistrano, since this folder isn't under version control.
The `reload` method added to max_votes validation is needed because the
author gets here with some changes because of the around_action
`switch_locale`, which adds some changes to the current user record and
therefore, the lock method raises an exception when trying to lock it
requiring us to save or discard those record changes.
In case we receive consecutive requests we are locking the poll author record
until the first request transaction ends, so the author answers count during
subsequent requests validations is up to date.
This mixin was being called twice for the `.budget-investment-show`
selector; once in the CSS including this code for all the "Show
participation" pages, and once in the CSS for budget investments.
The Google response contains an `email_verified` field instead of a
`verified_email` field, and so we weren't treating verified Google
accounts as verified.
We were duplicating the asset host and the URL host in all environments,
but we can make it so the asset host uses the URL host unless we
specifically set it.
Note that, inside the `ApplicationMailer`, the `root_url` method already
uses `default_url_options` to generate the URL.
In the rare case of CONSUL installations who have changed the asset
host, this change has no effect since they'll get a conflict in the
environment files when upgrading and they'll choose to use their own
asset host.
In the dev seeds, we were using `Setting["url"]/proposals`, but we can
use `proposals_url` instead, similar to what we do in the rest of the
application.
We can do a similar thing in the sitemap. This way the sitemap will also
work on installations who haven't manually set the "url" setting.
Since we aren't using `Setting["url"]` anywhere anymore, we're removing
it.
This setting was mainly redundant, since we already had the
`server_name` in the secrets. Furthermore, `server_name` is
automatically configured when running the installer, while
`Setting["url"]` had to be manually set in the admin section the
application was installed.
Note we're using `ActionMailer::Base` setting to generate URLs. Sounds a
bit strange, but it's a standard way Rails provides to generate URLs
outside the context of a request.
We've been using the `url` Setting for a long time, but since then we've
added a few references to `root_url` to this file, so we're now adding
consistency. We're also removing a now unnecessary condition.
We were using `Setting["url"]` to verify the content belonged to the
application URL, but we can use `root_url` instead.
Note that means we need to include the port when filling in forms in the
tests, since in tests URL helpers like `polymorphic_url` don't include
the port, but a port is automatically added when actually making the
request.
This task was "temporarily" removed in commit 7b6619528. Since that was
done three and a half years ago, right after the dashboard was
introduced, I think it's time to make this "temporary" measure a bit
more permanent ;).
By using the Rails `button_to` helper (which generates a form), and adapting the
response to `html` and `js` formats, the feature works with or without javascript
enabled.
We were rendering the `new` action, but that action doesn't exist.
Before commit ec861ca8e, we were rendering the `edit` action of an
answer, which was confusing as well.
Note that, when adding an invalid document, `@answer.documents` contains
that invalid document (which is not present in the database). Since
we're rendering the index, this new document would appear in the list of
the documents that can be deleted; to avoid that, we're kind of
"reloading" the answer object in the component by finding the record in
the database. We aren't using `@answer.reload` because doing so would
remove the validation errors.
