Note we're making the validation rule dynamic so it's affected by the
way we stub the constant in the tests to emulate data created in old
applications.
Co-Authored-By: Javi Martín <javim@elretirao.net>
These tasks are not needed for new installations, and in existing
installations they've already been executed when upgrading to version
1.1.
One of them also raises a warning in Rails 5.2:
DEPRECATION WARNING: Dangerous query method (method whose arguments are
used as raw SQL) called with non-attribute argument(s): "MIN(id) as id".
Non-attribute arguments will be disallowed in Rails 6.0. This method
should not be called with user-provided values, such as request
parameters or model attributes. Known-safe values can be passed by
wrapping them in Arel.sql()
If we didn't run this task, investments for existing budgets wouldn't
show their administrator/valuators as an option when we're editing them,
leading to data loss.
We were manually doing the same thing, generating inconsistent results,
since the method `valuation_tag_list` was using the `valuation` context,
when actually the expected behavior would be to use the `valuation_tag`
context.
We were very inconsistent regarding these rules.
Personally I prefer no empty lines around blocks, clases, etc... as
recommended by the Ruby style guide [1], and they're the default values
in rubocop, so those are the settings I'm applying.
The exception is the `private` access modifier, since we were leaving
empty lines around it most of the time. That's the default rubocop rule
as well. Personally I don't have a strong preference about this one.
[1] https://rubystyle.guide/#empty-lines-around-bodies
Having exceptions is better than having silent bugs.
There are a few methods I've kept the same way they were.
The `RelatedContentScore#score_with_opposite` method is a bit peculiar:
it creates scores for both itself and the opposite related content,
which means the opposite related content will try to create the same
scores as well.
We've already got a test to check `Budget::Ballot#add_investment` when
creating a line fails ("Edge case voting a non-elegible investment").
Finally, the method `User#send_oauth_confirmation_instructions` doesn't
update the record when the email address isn't already present, leading
to the test "Try to register with the email of an already existing user,
when an unconfirmed email was provided by oauth" fo fail if we raise an
exception for an invalid user. That's because updating a user's email
doesn't update the database automatically, but instead a confirmation
email is sent.
There are also a few false positives for classes which don't have bang
methods (like the GraphQL classes) or destroying attachments.
For these reasons, I'm adding the rule with a "Refactor" severity,
meaning it's a rule we can break if necessary.
I was thinking of leaving these tasks empty, so in the future we could
use them again if we rename or remove more settings. But since we
haven't renamed nor removed any settings for more than seven months, and
we've only used these tasks once, I'm simply removing the tasks. It's
easy to add them back if we ever need them.
Settings are stored in the database, and so any changes to the settings
done during the tests are automatically rolled back between one test and
the next one.
There were also a few places where we weren't using an `after` block but
changing the setting at the end of the test.
By default we want this attribute to be the current heading id for existing investments. If there have been reclassifications, this field should be updated accordingly.
The `type: :feature` is automatically detected by RSpec because these
tests are inside the `spec/features` folder. Using `feature` re-adds a
`type: :feature` to these files, which will result in a conflict when we
upgrade to Rails 5.1's system tests.
Because of this change, we also need to change `background` to `before`
or else these tests will fail.
After run the rake to move external_url to description for Proposals and Legislation proposals this spec is failing because external_url field doesn't exists anymore.
This spec is giving some problems related to duplicity of records due to the way rake tasks are loaded.
It will soon become part of seeds anyways. Removing for now.
These tasks dealt with data migrations or stats generations which were
done only once, so we don't need them anymore.
New CONSUL installations don't need these tasks, and existing CONSUL
installations will execute them when upgrading one release at a time.
Execute rake task every day to detect new actions available for not archived proposals. If there are new actions available for today, send email to proposal's author with information text, new actions available and link to proposal dashboard url.
From now on these static pages:
`/privacy'
`/conditions'
`/accesibility'
`/help/faq'
`/welcome'
have been moved to the DB and can be modified easily by any
administrator in `/admin/site_customization/pages'
When we insert a record in PostgreSQL and we specify the ID, the
internal ID sequence for that table isn't updated.
In order to keep the original IDs so we didn't break any foreign keys,
we specified the IDs when copying the table, resulting in a table having
its ID sequence with a value of an existing record. When trying to
insert a new record, we got a `PG::UniqueViolation` exception.
Updating the sequence after the data migration might not be the most
elegant solution, but it's easy to do and it's already been tested on a
production environment.
Calling `load_tasks` in several files made rails load the tasks several
times, and so they were executed several times when called.
Since the milestone migration can't be executed twice in a row (it would
fail with duplicated ID records), loading the tasks several times made
the milestone migrations task specs fail.
