For the HashAlignment rule, we're using the default `key` style (keys
are aligned and values aren't) instead of the `table` style (both keys
and values are aligned) because, even if we used both in the
application, we used the `key` style a lot more. Furthermore, the
`table` style looks strange in places where there are both very long and
very short keys and sometimes we weren't even consistent with the
`table` style, aligning some keys without aligning other keys.
Ideally we could align hashes to "either key or table", so developers
can decide whether keeping the symmetry of the code is worth it in a
case-per-case basis, but Rubocop doesn't allow this option.
When customizing CONSUL, one of the most common actions is adding a new
field to a form.
This requires modifying the permitted/allowed parameters. However, in
most cases, the method returning these parameters returned an instance
of `ActionController::Parameters`, so adding more parameters to it
wasn't easy.
So customizing the code required copying the method returning those
parameters and adding the new ones. For example:
```
def something_params
params.require(:something).permit(
:one_consul_attribute,
:another_consul_attribute,
:my_custom_attribute
)
end
```
This meant that, if the `something_params` method changed in CONSUL, the
customization of this method had to be updated as well.
So we're extracting the logic returning the parameters to a method which
returns an array. Now this code can be customized without copying the
original method:
```
alias_method :consul_allowed_params, :allowed_params
def allowed_params
consul_allowed_params + [:my_custom_attribute]
end
```
Having exceptions is better than having silent bugs.
There are a few methods I've kept the same way they were.
The `RelatedContentScore#score_with_opposite` method is a bit peculiar:
it creates scores for both itself and the opposite related content,
which means the opposite related content will try to create the same
scores as well.
We've already got a test to check `Budget::Ballot#add_investment` when
creating a line fails ("Edge case voting a non-elegible investment").
Finally, the method `User#send_oauth_confirmation_instructions` doesn't
update the record when the email address isn't already present, leading
to the test "Try to register with the email of an already existing user,
when an unconfirmed email was provided by oauth" fo fail if we raise an
exception for an invalid user. That's because updating a user's email
doesn't update the database automatically, but instead a confirmation
email is sent.
There are also a few false positives for classes which don't have bang
methods (like the GraphQL classes) or destroying attachments.
For these reasons, I'm adding the rule with a "Refactor" severity,
meaning it's a rule we can break if necessary.
This table will store which reports (stats, results, ...) will be shown
for a certain process (polls, budgets, ...).
Note Rails fails to save a poll and its report when both are new records
if we add a `validate :process, presence: true` rule. Since it caused a
lot of trouble when creating records for tests during factories rule
completely. Instead, I've created the `results_enabled=` and
`stats_enabled=` methods, so tests are easier to set up, while also
automatically creating a report if it doesn't already exist. This also
decouples form structure and database implemenation.
Originally I named this table `enabled_reports` and instead of having
`stats` and `results` columns, it had an `enabled` column and a `kind`
column, which would be set to "stats" or "results". However, although
that table would allow us to add arbitrary reports easily, I found the
way we had to handle the `has_many` relationship was a bit too complex.
Since we removed the `best_in_place` gem, this method doesn't exist
anymore. We're replacing it with what the method actually does.
Note the test doesn't check the poll is correctly updated. We could add
a `visit proposal_dashboard_polls_path(proposal)` before checking the
"Show results" field, but then we would enter a race condition between
this request and the AJAX request. A proper solution would be to provide
actual feedback to the user so they know the poll has been updated, and
then checking that feedback is present in the tests.
An author will see a "new" tag on each action or resource that has appeared on his dashboard since his last login.
Too add "new" tag on dashbord menu when there are new resources.
- Display recommended_proposals on new section as goals with toogle.
- Divide recommended actions into actions done and actions pending to clarify the information to the user as summary_recomended_actions.
Dashboard routes have been refactored. Now instead of having resources
for dashboard and routes inside a dashboard namespace the proposal
routes contain a dashboar singleton containing everything related to it.
FIxed issue in last commit: supports controller were not correctly
filling the holes without data.
Fixed duplication in supports and successful supports controller using a
concer.
Successfull supports controller will fill the holes without data in the
same way that supports controller does.
Supports controller now fill the holes in the results: When there are no
supports collected for one interval it takes the accumulated value from the
previous one.
Data starts in the publication date.
* Added missing specs
* Removed models that were refactored previously
* Added simplecov when executing specs locally
* Fixed bug in poll model validation that was causing an 500 error.
View questions now is View results and redirects to results
in public view.
Fixed flaky spec that was making the tests fail.
Added missing specs for polls feature as well as poll model.
Added check in poll card that allows setting the value of
results_enabled flag.
Access to stats/results now is controlled with abilities.
Polls related to proposals will be accessible to the proposal author
like they were administrators.
Implements 182. resources are shown as cards in dashboard progress view.
Implements #182
Implements 182. resources are shown as cards in dashboard progress view.
Back to polls has dissapeared. A link 'Back to proposal' will be shown
instead.
The button that invites the user to take part in other polls has been
removed.
Stats will flagged as disabled when a poll for a proposal is created.
