Change to_not for not_to
Eventhough some of us sentimentals still like the syntax `to_not` the current trend is to move to the new syntax `not_to`. In this commit we are updating the references of expectations that used `to_not` to `not_to`.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ feature 'Legislation' do
|
||||
|
||||
visit legislation_process_path(process)
|
||||
|
||||
expect(page).to_not have_content("Additional information")
|
||||
expect(page).not_to have_content("Additional information")
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
scenario "Shows another translation when the default locale isn't available" do
|
||||
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ feature 'Legislation' do
|
||||
visit legislation_process_path(process)
|
||||
|
||||
expect(page).to have_content("This phase is not open yet")
|
||||
expect(page).to_not have_content("Participate in the debate")
|
||||
expect(page).not_to have_content("Participate in the debate")
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
scenario 'open without questions' do
|
||||
@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ feature 'Legislation' do
|
||||
|
||||
visit legislation_process_path(process)
|
||||
|
||||
expect(page).to_not have_content("Participate in the debate")
|
||||
expect(page).to_not have_content("This phase is not open yet")
|
||||
expect(page).not_to have_content("Participate in the debate")
|
||||
expect(page).not_to have_content("This phase is not open yet")
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
scenario 'open with questions' do
|
||||
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ feature 'Legislation' do
|
||||
expect(page).to have_content("Question 1")
|
||||
expect(page).to have_content("Question 2")
|
||||
expect(page).to have_content("Participate in the debate")
|
||||
expect(page).to_not have_content("This phase is not open yet")
|
||||
expect(page).not_to have_content("This phase is not open yet")
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
include_examples "not published permissions", :debate_legislation_process_path
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user